140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35787214)
1. Finite element analysis potentially identifies nonessential prophylactic stabilization in femurs with metastatic disease.
Johnson JE; Goetz JE; Brouillette MJ; Miller BJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Sep; 236(9):1297-1308. PubMed ID: 35787214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study.
Sternheim A; Giladi O; Gortzak Y; Drexler M; Salai M; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C; Yosibash Z
Bone; 2018 May; 110():215-220. PubMed ID: 29475110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical Gains Associated With Virtual Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Femurs With Metastatic Disease.
Johnson JE; Figueroa AV; Brouillette MJ; Miller BJ; Goetz JE
Iowa Orthop J; 2023 Dec; 43(2):70-78. PubMed ID: 38213856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mirels' score for upper limb metastatic lesions: do we need a different cutoff for recommending prophylactic fixation?
Hoban KA; Downie S; Adamson DJA; MacLean JG; Cool P; Jariwala AC
JSES Int; 2022 Jul; 6(4):675-681. PubMed ID: 35813136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mirels Scores in Patients Undergoing Prophylactic Stabilization for Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease in the Veterans Administration Healthcare System.
Ramsey DC; Lam PW; Hayden J; Doung YC; Gundle KR
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2020 Sep; 4(9):e20.00141. PubMed ID: 32890013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations.
Johnson JE; Brouillette MJ; Miller BJ; Goetz JE
Biomed Eng Comput Biol; 2023; 14():11795972231166240. PubMed ID: 37020922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?
Sternheim A; Traub F; Trabelsi N; Dadia S; Gortzak Y; Snir N; Gorfine M; Yosibash Z
Bone Joint J; 2020 May; 102-B(5):638-645. PubMed ID: 32349590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chemotherapy May Obviate Prophylactic Femoral Nail Surgery for Multiple Myeloma Patients With High Mirels' Score Lesions and Impending Pathological Hip Fracture.
Divekar O; Ajayi B; Barkham B; Bernard J; Bishop T; Reyal Y; Willis F; Boyd K; Lui D; Coomber R
Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37670. PubMed ID: 37206489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of deep learning-based lesion segmentation on failure load calculations of metastatic femurs using finite element analysis.
Ataei A; Eggermont F; Verdonschot N; Lessmann N; Tanck E
Bone; 2024 Feb; 179():116987. PubMed ID: 38061504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulating activities of daily living with finite element analysis improves fracture prediction for patients with metastatic femoral lesions.
Goodheart JR; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1226-34. PubMed ID: 25761000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining agreement between finite element modelling methodologies in predicting pathological fracture risk in proximal femurs with bone metastases.
O'Rourke D; Johnson LJ; Jagiello J; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Apr; 104():105931. PubMed ID: 36906986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-specific computed tomography-based finite element analysis: a new tool to assess fracture risk in benign bone lesions of the femur.
Schermann H; Gortzak Y; Kollender Y; Dadia S; Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z; Sternheim A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105155. PubMed ID: 32916567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mirels' rating for humerus lesions is both reproducible and valid.
Evans AR; Bottros J; Grant W; Chen BY; Damron TA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Jun; 466(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18357496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The insufficiencies of risk analysis of impending pathological fractures in patients with femoral metastases: A literature review.
Benca E; Patsch JM; Mayr W; Pahr DH; Windhager R
Bone Rep; 2016 Dec; 5():51-56. PubMed ID: 28326347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can a Novel Scoring System Improve on the Mirels Score in Predicting the Fracture Risk in Patients with Multiple Myeloma?
Toci GR; Bressner JA; Morris CD; Fayad L; Levin AS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Mar; 479(3):521-530. PubMed ID: 32420721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of DXA-based finite element analysis of the proximal femur in a longitudinal study of hip fracture.
Naylor KE; McCloskey EV; Eastell R; Yang L
J Bone Miner Res; 2013 May; 28(5):1014-21. PubMed ID: 23281096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease.
Damron TA; Mann KA
J Orthop Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):1175-1190. PubMed ID: 32162711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
