These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The fall of Roe Lewandowska M BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1608. PubMed ID: 35768122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion Access for People Experiencing Incarceration: The Promise and Limitations of Roe v Wade. Kolbi-Molinas A Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 138(3):328-329. PubMed ID: 34352839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reversal of Dhara A Can Fam Physician; 2022 Oct; 68(10):764-765. PubMed ID: 36241410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. One Year After Dobbs-Vast Changes to the Abortion Legal Landscape. Gostin LO; Wetter S; Reingold RB JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Aug; 4(8):e233091. PubMed ID: 37535348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective. Kaplan L Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade. Trends in the mortality and morbidity of women. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA; 1992 Dec; 268(22):3231-9. PubMed ID: 1433765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Sound law and undoubtedly good policy": Roe v. Wade in comparative perspective. Mylchreest I J Policy Hist; 1995; 7(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 12346345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unintended consequences: abortion training in the years after Roe v Wade. Aksel S; Fein L; Ketterer E; Young E; Backus L Am J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 103(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 23327239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unborn in the USA: what happened and what's next for Roe Silberner J BMJ; 2022 May; 377():o1184. PubMed ID: 35580891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals. Benshoof J Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal Challenges for Family Physicians in the Post-Roe v Wade Era. Kirchner E Am Fam Physician; 2023 Apr; 107(4):344-347. PubMed ID: 37054406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mortality from abortion after Roe vs Wade. Smargisso DM; Lester D Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):780. PubMed ID: 12530723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. People v. Frey. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. West German abortion decision: a contrast to Roe v. Wade. Jonas RE; Gorby JD John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 9(3):605-84. PubMed ID: 11663653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician provision of abortion before Roe v. Wade. Joffe C Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():21-32. PubMed ID: 12317573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]