These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35788269)

  • 1. Bayesian Inference With Gaussian Process Surrogates to Characterize Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Skin From Suction Tests.
    Song G; An J; Tepole AB; Lee T
    J Biomech Eng; 2022 Dec; 144(12):. PubMed ID: 35788269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Reliability of Suction Measurements for Skin Characterization.
    Mueller B; Elrod J; Distler O; Schiestl C; Mazza E
    J Biomech Eng; 2021 Feb; 143(2):. PubMed ID: 32601661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the mechanical properties of the skin using the suction test.
    Khatyr F; Imberdis C; Varchon D; Lagarde JM; Josse G
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16420535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian approach for characterization of soft tissue viscoelasticity in acoustic radiation force imaging.
    Zhao X; Pelegri AA
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Apr; 32(4):e02741. PubMed ID: 26255624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anisotropic mechanical characterization of human skin by in vivo multi-axial ring suction test.
    Elouneg A; Chambert J; Lejeune A; Lucot Q; Jacquet E; Bordas SPA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 May; 141():105779. PubMed ID: 36940583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel ultra-light suction device for mechanical characterization of skin.
    Müller B; Elrod J; Pensalfini M; Hopf R; Distler O; Schiestl C; Mazza E
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201440. PubMed ID: 30089132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical characterisation of in vivo human skin using a 3D force-sensitive micro-robot and finite element analysis.
    Flynn C; Taberner A; Nielsen P
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Feb; 10(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 20429025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlations between small aperture skin suction parameters: statistical analysis and mechanical model.
    Schlangen LJ; Brokken D; van Kemenade PM
    Skin Res Technol; 2003 May; 9(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 12709130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elastic-viscoplastic modeling of soft biological tissues using a mixed finite element formulation based on the relative deformation gradient.
    Weickenmeier J; Jabareen M
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1238-62. PubMed ID: 24817477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical behavior of the superficial layers of the face.
    Barbarino GG; Jabareen M; Mazza E
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 Nov; 17(4):434-44. PubMed ID: 21362059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An anisotropic, hyperelastic model for skin: experimental measurements, finite element modelling and identification of parameters for human and murine skin.
    Groves RB; Coulman SA; Birchall JC; Evans SL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Feb; 18():167-80. PubMed ID: 23274398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New methodology for mechanical characterization of human superficial facial tissue anisotropic behaviour in vivo.
    Then C; Stassen B; Depta K; Silber G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():68-79. PubMed ID: 28259786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical simulation of mechanical tests on a living skin using anisotropic hyperelastic law.
    Alliliche W; Renaud C; Cros JM; Feng ZQ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 May; 141():105755. PubMed ID: 36898353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the test area on the mechanical properties of skin.
    Piérard GE; Nikkels-Tassoudji N; Piérard-Franchimont C
    Dermatology; 1995; 191(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 8589499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can machine learning accelerate soft material parameter identification from complex mechanical test data?
    Kakaletsis S; Lejeune E; Rausch MK
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2023 Feb; 22(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 36229697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suction based mechanical characterization of superficial facial soft tissues.
    Weickenmeier J; Jabareen M; Mazza E
    J Biomech; 2015 Dec; 48(16):4279-86. PubMed ID: 26584965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A compressible anisotropic hyperelastic model with
    Wang MN; Liu FJ
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Dec; 23(16):1277-1286. PubMed ID: 32692257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Gaussian process approach for rapid evaluation of skin tension.
    Nagle M; Conroy Broderick H; Vedel C; Destrade M; Fop M; Ní Annaidh A
    Acta Biomater; 2024 Jul; 182():54-66. PubMed ID: 38750916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies of biaxial mechanical properties and nonlinear finite element modeling of skin.
    Shang X; Yen MR; Gaber MW
    Mol Cell Biomech; 2010 Jun; 7(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 20936741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.