These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35788395)
1. vNOTES Hysterectomy, Adnexectomy, and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Walk-Through Guide. Zakhari A; Nguyen DB; Smith JP; Mansour FW; Krishnamurthy S J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1134-1135. PubMed ID: 35788395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament. Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy: An Innovative Approach for Treatment of Uterine Prolapse. Lowenstein L; Ben-David C; Mick I; Levi G; Matanes E; Mor O J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1818-1819. PubMed ID: 34171475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Sec Shull by Vaginal Natural Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES). Scollo P; Pecorino B; Ferrara M; Mereu L J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Jun; 44(6):703. PubMed ID: 35276427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Techniques for Apical Prolapse Management in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension. Liu J; Lin Q; Zhou X; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1144-1145. PubMed ID: 33130226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction. Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse. Jan H; Ghai V; Doumouchtsis SK J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):952-953. PubMed ID: 29274382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Feasibility and Safety of vNOTES Hysterectomy and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Case Series. Farah S; Albaini O; Al Jardali M; Daccache A; Jallad K J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 May; 30(5):414-417. PubMed ID: 36646312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience from a tertiary care hospital. Alay I; Kaya C; Cengiz H; Yildiz S; Aslan O; Yasar L; Ekin M Asian J Endosc Surg; 2021 Jul; 14(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 32967055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy. Pal M; Bandyopadhyay S Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):633-637. PubMed ID: 29777272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D; JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. vNOTES versus Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Perioperative and Short-Term Outcomes. Morganstein T; Gangal M; Belzile E; Sohaei D; Bentaleb J; Reuveni-Salzman A; Merovitz L; Walter JE; Larouche M Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Sep; 35(9):1899-1908. PubMed ID: 39215808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High uterosacral ligament suspension in radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure to prevent pelvic organ prolapse. Cai L; Qu X; Xu L; Cao J; Li D Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Nov; 34(11):2839-2842. PubMed ID: 37417994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension in patients who had concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for subtotal uterine prolapse. Ekin M; Dura MC; Yildiz S; Gürsoy B; Yildiz YY; Dogan K; Kaya C Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Jul; 17(3):e13333. PubMed ID: 38839273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [High vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of uterine prolapse]. Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Zhao Y; Zhang L; Hu ML; Ge J; Ke N Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 42(12):797-801. PubMed ID: 18476508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]