149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35788434)
1. Cephalometric Variables Prediction from Lateral Photographs Between Different Skeletal Patterns Using Regression Artificial Neural Networks.
Ali SM; Saloom HF; Tawfeeq MA
Turk J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 35(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 35788434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.
Çoban G; Öztürk T; Hashimli N; Yağci A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e222112. PubMed ID: 35976288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
Bielawska H
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of the Relationship between Sagittal Skeletal Nasal Profile Morphology and Malocclusions: A Lateral Cephalometric Film Study.
Ocak Y; Cicek O; Ozkalayci N; Erener H
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36766568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric Characteristic of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Javanese Population at Universitas Airlangga Dental Hospital.
Ardani IGAW; Sanjaya ML; Sjamsudin J
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Sep; 9(Suppl 2):S342-S346. PubMed ID: 30294169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vowel sound production and its association with cephalometric characteristics in skeletal Class III subjects.
Pravitharangul N; Miyamoto JJ; Yoshizawa H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki S; Chantarawaratit PO; Moriyama K
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 35731636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.
Mahto RK; Kafle D; Giri A; Luintel S; Karki A
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):132. PubMed ID: 35440037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upper Airway Dimensions among Different Skeletal Malocclusions: A Retrospective Observational Study by Cephalometric Analysis.
Sfondrini MF; Gallo S; Pascadopoli M; Gandini P; Roncoroni C; Scribante A
Dent J (Basel); 2024 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 38248220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis.
Martinez P; Bellot-Arcís C; Llamas JM; Cibrian R; Gandia JL; Paredes-Gallardo V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 28034574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiographs on extraction decision in skeletal class I patients.
Dinçer B; Yetkiner E; Aras I; Attin T; Attin R
Head Face Med; 2013 Dec; 9():36. PubMed ID: 24304887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class I Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles.
Camcı H; Salmanpour F
Turk J Orthod; 2020 Sep; 33(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 32974063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distribution of Various Maxilla-Mandibular Positions and Cephalometric Comparison in Chinese Skeletal Class II Malocclusions.
Xiong X; Huang Y; Liu W; Wu Y; Yi Y; Wang J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):822-828. PubMed ID: 33568599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of facial features and prediction of lip position in skeletal class III malocclusion adult patients undergoing surgical-orthodontic treatment.
Lu W; Song G; Sun Q; Peng L; Zhang Y; Wei Y; Han B; Lin J
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5227-5238. PubMed ID: 33590299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A heuristic model for cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal dysplasia.
Khandelwal M; Ramaiah PT; Setty S; Subramonia S; Kapoor S; Karajagi S
J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 34841940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
Devereux L; Moles D; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e175-81. PubMed ID: 21300228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network- Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection.
Uğurlu M
Turk J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 35(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 35788433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of various cephalometric facial planes with intercanine width in orthodontic patients.
Khan EB; Soomar S; Shah M; Fatima S; Khan S; Ahmed Z; Kumar S
J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():22. PubMed ID: 35754418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
