These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35788434)

  • 21. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An investigation of cervicovertebral morphology in different sagittal skeletal growth patterns.
    Baydaş B; Yavuz I; Durna N; Ceylan I
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14994881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic Classification for Sagittal Craniofacial Patterns Based on Different Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Li H; Xu Y; Lei Y; Wang Q; Gao X
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 May; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35741169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CEPHALOMETRIC FEATURES OF CLASS III MALOCCLUSION.
    Zegan G; Dascălu C; Mavru RB; Anistoroaei D
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2015; 119(4):1153-60. PubMed ID: 26793863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements.
    de Carvalho Rosas Gomes L; Horta KO; Gandini LG; Gonçalves M; Gonçalves JR
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 23597034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Associations between severity of dentofacial deformity and motivation for orthodontic-orthognathic surgery treatment.
    Wilmot JJ; Barber HD; Chou DG; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 8297053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative assessment of cephalometric with its analogous photographic variables.
    Gupta S; Tandon P; Singh GP; Shastri D
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 35911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network.
    Jeon S; Lee KC
    Prog Orthod; 2021 May; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 34056670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A community detection analysis of malocclusion classes from orthodontics and upper airway data.
    Di Carlo G; Gili T; Caldarelli G; Polimeni A; Cattaneo PM
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():172-180. PubMed ID: 33966341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation between vertical components and skeletal Class II malocclusion in ethnic Javanese.
    Ardani IGAW; Willyanti I; Narmada IB
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2018; 10():297-302. PubMed ID: 30588125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the relationship between the maxillary third molars and pterygomaxillary fissure by cephalometric radiographs.
    Sadry S; Koca CG; Kaya I
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2021; 80(2):425-431. PubMed ID: 32896867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The relationship between dentofacial morphology and smile characteristics in lateral and oblique views.
    Cheng JH; Luechapanichkul MJ; Lee TY
    J Dent Sci; 2021 Jan; 16(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 33384776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 15224054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
    Plaza SP; Reimpell A; Silva J; Montoya D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 24(4):63-72. PubMed ID: 31508708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dental arch and cephalometric changes following treatment for class III malocclusion by means of the function regulator (FR-3) appliance.
    Kalavritinos M; Papadopoulos MA; Nasiopoulos A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Mar; 66(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 15827701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study.
    Johnston C; Burden D; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16979487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of pharyngeal airway in North Indian children with different skeletal patterns.
    Kochhar AS; Sidhu MS; Bhasin R; Kochhar GK; Dadlani H; Sandhu J; Virk B
    World J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 13(2):40-52. PubMed ID: 33728030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric association of mandibular size/length to the surface area and dimensions of the frontal and maxillary sinuses.
    Yassaei S; Emami A; Mirbeigi S
    Eur J Dent; 2018; 12(2):253-261. PubMed ID: 29988236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.