242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35788756)
1. Impact of contrast-enhanced mammography in surgical management of breast cancers for women with dense breasts: a dual-center, multi-disciplinary study in Asia.
Goh Y; Chou CP; Chan CW; Buhari SA; Hartman M; Tang SW; Ng CWQ; Pillay P; Chua W; Jagmohan P; Sterling E; Wong YM; Tan LY; Ong HY; Pan HB; Lee HS; Hung BH; Quek ST
Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8226-8237. PubMed ID: 35788756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Yield of Pre-operative Breast MRI in Patients According to Breast Tissue Density.
Seely JM; Lamb L; Malik N; Lau J
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3280-9. PubMed ID: 26620958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpreting contrast imaging to plan breast surgery.
Taylor DB; Hobbs MM; Ronald MM; Burrows S; Ives A; Parizel PM; Saunders CM
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Sep; 93(9):2197-2202. PubMed ID: 37438677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Miller MM; Mayorov S; Ganti R; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Caley M; Jahjah J; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA; Rooney TB
J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38537570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.
Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in pre-surgical evaluation of breast malignant lesions in dense breasts: a single center study.
Bozzini A; Nicosia L; Pruneri G; Maisonneuve P; Meneghetti L; Renne G; Vingiani A; Cassano E; Mastropasqua MG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Dec; 184(3):723-731. PubMed ID: 32860166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Versus Ultrasonography: Diagnostic Performance in Symptomatic Patients with Dense Breasts.
Lu Z; Hao C; Pan Y; Mao N; Wang X; Yin X
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 21(4):442-449. PubMed ID: 32193892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Associated With Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Karimi Z; Phillips J; Slanetz P; Lotfi P; Dialani V; Karimova J; Mehta T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):340-348. PubMed ID: 32755162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
