131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35791726)
21. Effective Protocol for Daily High-quality Direct Posterior Composite Restorations: Layering and Finishing.
Peumans M; Politano G; Bazos P; Severino D; Van Meerbeek B
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(6):597-613. PubMed ID: 33491404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R; Pelka M; Petschelt A
J Dent; 1999 Jul; 27(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 10377606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months.
Gresnigt MM; Kalk W; Özcan M
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):823-32. PubMed ID: 22821429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin.
Urcuyo Alvarado MS; Escobar García DM; Pozos Guillén AJ; Flores Arriaga JC; Romo Ramírez GF; Ortiz Magdaleno M
Eur J Dent; 2020 Oct; 14(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 32932533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems.
Akar GC; Pekkan G; Çal E; Eskitaşçıoğlu G; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 24513427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design.
Boemicke W; Kappel S; Stober T; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24912399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
Madhyastha PS; Hegde S; Srikant N; Kotian R; Iyer SS
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2017; 14(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 29109747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Class II restorations with margins below the CEJ.
Kanca J; Greitzer G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 19508264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A 4- to 6-year retrospective clinical study of cracked teeth restored with bonded indirect resin composite onlays.
Signore A; Benedicenti S; Covani U; Ravera G
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 18069370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
Donovan TE; Chee WW
Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 1-Year clinical study of indirect resin composite restorations luted with a self-adhesive resin cement: effect of enamel etching.
Azevedo CG; De Goes MF; Ambrosano GM; Chan DC
Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22666765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Seating, finishing, and polishing of ceramic restorations.
Small BW
Gen Dent; 1999; 47(6):560-2. PubMed ID: 10687448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extending the service life of existing dental restorations with esthetic and functional limitations.
Strasding M; Fehmer V; Pjetursson BE; Sailer I
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):893-896. PubMed ID: 29042114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of finishing time on marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems.
Yap AU; Ang HQ; Chong KC
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Nov; 25(11):871-6. PubMed ID: 9846907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of 860 anterior and posterior lithium disilicate restorations: retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 3 years and a maximum observational period of 6 years.
Fabbri G; Zarone F; Dellificorelli G; Cannistraro G; De Lorenzi M; Mosca A; Sorrentino R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2014; 34(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 24600653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Indirect resin inlay and onlay restorations: a comprehensive clinical overview.
Jackson RD
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 11(8):891-900; quiz 902. PubMed ID: 10853596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does Finishing and Polishing of Restorative Materials Affect Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation? A Systematic Review.
Dutra D; Pereira G; Kantorski KZ; Valandro LF; Zanatta FB
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):E37-E52. PubMed ID: 29284102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years.
D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; D'Amario M
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1071-9. PubMed ID: 21773711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
