BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35792370)

  • 1. Age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score are not independent risk factors for severe complications after curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Dutch population-based cohort study.
    Baranov N; Claassen L; van Workum F; Rosman C
    Surg Oncol; 2022 Aug; 43():101789. PubMed ID: 35792370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Age on Complications and Overall Survival After Ivor Lewis Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Baranov NS; van Workum F; van der Maas J; Kouwenhoven E; van Det M; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Jul; 23(7):1293-1300. PubMed ID: 30565069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 15-Year Experience with Multimodality Therapy Including Esophagectomy for Elderly Patients with Locoregional Esophageal Cancer.
    Sawyer WP; Luo X; Welch AM; Bolton NM; Brown R; Bolton JS
    J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Apr; 232(4):580-588. PubMed ID: 33549634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term outcome for high-risk patients after esophagectomy.
    Plat VD; Stam WT; Bootsma BT; Straatman J; Klausch T; Heineman DJ; van der Peet DL; Daams F;
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score matching.
    Hong ZN; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Weng K; Peng K; Lin J; Kang M
    Esophagus; 2022 Apr; 19(2):224-232. PubMed ID: 34988773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs. Open Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Comparison.
    Vincke A; Miftode S; Alfarawan F; Bockhorn M; El-Sourani N
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis.
    Baranov NS; Slootmans C; van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Schoon Y; Rosman C
    World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2021 Feb; 13(2):131-146. PubMed ID: 33643529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Population-based Study on Lymph Node Retrieval in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
    van der Werf LR; Dikken JL; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Lemmens VEPP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijnhoven BPL;
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 25(5):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 29524046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).
    van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van der Horst S; Verhage RJ; Besselink MG; Prins MJ; Haverkamp L; Schippers C; Rinkes IH; Joore HC; Ten Kate FJ; Koffijberg H; Kroese CC; van Leeuwen MS; Lolkema MP; Reerink O; Schipper ME; Steenhagen E; Vleggaar FP; Voest EE; Siersema PD; van Hillegersberg R
    Trials; 2012 Nov; 13():230. PubMed ID: 23199187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
    Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
    Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
    Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety comparison of minimally invasive abdomen-only esophagectomy versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wang CP; Rogers MP; Bach G; Sujka J; Mhaskar R; DuCoin C
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1887-1893. PubMed ID: 33825009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy by comprehensive complication index.
    Ma G; Cao H; Wei R; Qu X; Wang L; Zhu L; Du J; Wang Y
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(4):789-794. PubMed ID: 29970654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal or gastric cancer.
    Busweiler LA; Henneman D; Dikken JL; Fiocco M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BP; van Hillegersberg R; Rosman C; Wouters MW; van Sandick JW;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1962-1969. PubMed ID: 28797755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.