These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35792742)

  • 21. A simple powerful bivariate test for two sample location problems in experimental and observational studies.
    Tabesh H; Ayatollahi SM; Towhidi M
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2010 May; 7():13. PubMed ID: 20459659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the solution multiplicity of the Fleishman method and its impact in simulation studies.
    Olvera Astivia OL; Zumbo BD
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):437-458. PubMed ID: 29323414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spurious correlations--causes and cures.
    Halperin S
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 1986; 11(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 3704066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is coefficient alpha robust to non-normal data?
    Sheng Y; Sheng Z
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():34. PubMed ID: 22363306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing for heterogeneity among phenotypic correlations: a comparison of methods using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Brown RP
    Genetica; 1997 Sep; 101(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16220248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Confidence intervals for correlations when data are not normal.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):294-309. PubMed ID: 26822671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Significance tests to determine the direction of effects in linear regression models.
    Wiedermann W; Hagmann M; von Eye A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Feb; 68(1):116-41. PubMed ID: 24620829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Skew
    Hohmann L; Holtmann J; Eid M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1323. PubMed ID: 30116209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data.
    de Winter JC; Gosling SD; Potter J
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):273-90. PubMed ID: 27213982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation.
    Cain MK; Zhang Z; Yuan KH
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1716-1735. PubMed ID: 27752968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The sensitivity of structural equation modeling with ordinal data to underlying non-normality and observed distributional forms.
    Foldnes N; Grønneberg S
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):541-567. PubMed ID: 33793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Four improved statistics for contrasting means by correcting skewness and kurtosis.
    Yanagihara H; Yuan KH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):209-37. PubMed ID: 16293198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inferential procedures based on the weighted Pearson correlation coefficient test statistic.
    Yu H; Hutson AD
    J Appl Stat; 2024; 51(3):481-496. PubMed ID: 38370269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Residual Normality Assumption and the Estimation of Multiple Membership Random Effects Models.
    Chen J; Leroux AJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):898-913. PubMed ID: 30521398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs.
    Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM
    Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Monte Carlo investigation of the Fisher Z transformation for normal and nonnormal distributions.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1101-14. PubMed ID: 11272750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direction of Effects in Multiple Linear Regression Models.
    Wiedermann W; von Eye A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 26609741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nonrandom sampling in human genetics: skewness and kurtosis.
    Chakraborty R; Hanis CL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):87-101. PubMed ID: 3582959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.