185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35792791)
1. Change in crown inclination accompanying initial tooth alignment with round archwires.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(3):e2220489. PubMed ID: 35792791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.
Holtmann S; Konermann A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Montasser M; El-Bialy T; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 25344125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation into the effects of stainless steel ligature ties on the mechanical characteristics of conventional and self-ligated brackets subjected to torque.
Al Fakir H; Carey JP; Melenka GW; Nobes DS; Heo G; Major PW
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 24596162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Friction and archwire engagement in contemporary self-ligating appliance systems : An in vitro comparison.
Greene M; Rizkalla A; Burkhart T; Mamandras A; Tassi A
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):65-73. PubMed ID: 34779866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Galvanic Currents Generated Between Different Combinations of Orthodontic Brackets and Archwires Using Potentiostat: An In Vitro Study.
Nayak RS; Shafiuddin B; Pasha A; Vinay K; Narayan A; Shetty SV
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jul; 7(7):29-35. PubMed ID: 26229367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
Monteiro MR; Silva LE; Elias CN; Vilella Ode V
J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Khawatmi S; Dirk C; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 28339591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
