183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35792875)
1. A comparative analysis of genomic and phenomic predictions of growth-related traits in 3-way coffee hybrids.
Mbebi AJ; Breitler JC; Bordeaux M; Sulpice R; McHale M; Tong H; Toniutti L; Castillo JA; Bertrand B; Nikoloski Z
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 35792875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance of phenomic selection depends on the genetic architecture of the target trait.
Zhu X; Maurer HP; Jenz M; Hahn V; Ruckelshausen A; Leiser WL; Würschum T
Theor Appl Genet; 2022 Feb; 135(2):653-665. PubMed ID: 34807268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictor bias in genomic and phenomic selection.
Dallinger HG; Löschenberger F; Bistrich H; Ametz C; Hetzendorfer H; Morales L; Michel S; Buerstmayr H
Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Oct; 136(11):235. PubMed ID: 37878079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy phenomic prediction can perform similarly to genomic prediction of maize agronomic traits across environments.
DeSalvio AJ; Adak A; Murray SC; Jarquín D; Winans ND; Crozier D; Rooney WL
Plant Genome; 2024 Jun; 17(2):e20454. PubMed ID: 38715204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection.
Robert P; Auzanneau J; Goudemand E; Oury FX; Rolland B; Heumez E; Bouchet S; Le Gouis J; Rincent R
Theor Appl Genet; 2022 Mar; 135(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 34988629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phenomic Selection: A New and Efficient Alternative to Genomic Selection.
Robert P; Brault C; Rincent R; Segura V
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2467():397-420. PubMed ID: 35451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials.
Robert P; Goudemand E; Auzanneau J; Oury FX; Rolland B; Heumez E; Bouchet S; Caillebotte A; Mary-Huard T; Le Gouis J; Rincent R
Theor Appl Genet; 2022 Oct; 135(10):3337-3356. PubMed ID: 35939074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unraveling the potential of phenomic selection within and among diverse breeding material of maize (Zea mays L.).
Weiß TM; Zhu X; Leiser WL; Li D; Liu W; Schipprack W; Melchinger AE; Hahn V; Würschum T
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35100379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phenotypic Data from Inbred Parents Can Improve Genomic Prediction in Pearl Millet Hybrids.
Liang Z; Gupta SK; Yeh CT; Zhang Y; Ngu DW; Kumar R; Patil HT; Mungra KD; Yadav DV; Rathore A; Srivastava RK; Gupta R; Yang J; Varshney RK; Schnable PS; Schnable JC
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2513-2522. PubMed ID: 29794163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phenomic data-driven biological prediction of maize through field-based high-throughput phenotyping integration with genomic data.
Adak A; Kang M; Anderson SL; Murray SC; Jarquin D; Wong RKW; Katzfuß M
J Exp Bot; 2023 Sep; 74(17):5307-5326. PubMed ID: 37279568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using drone-retrieved multispectral data for phenomic selection in potato breeding.
Maggiorelli A; Baig N; Prigge V; Bruckmüller J; Stich B
Theor Appl Genet; 2024 Mar; 137(3):70. PubMed ID: 38446220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phenomic prediction of maize hybrids.
Edlich-Muth C; Muraya MM; Altmann T; Selbig J
Biosystems; 2016 Aug; 146():102-9. PubMed ID: 27212062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interest of phenomic prediction as an alternative to genomic prediction in grapevine.
Brault C; Lazerges J; Doligez A; Thomas M; Ecarnot M; Roumet P; Bertrand Y; Berger G; Pons T; François P; Le Cunff L; This P; Segura V
Plant Methods; 2022 Sep; 18(1):108. PubMed ID: 36064570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic models with genotype × environment interaction for predicting hybrid performance: an application in maize hybrids.
Acosta-Pech R; Crossa J; de Los Campos G; Teyssèdre S; Claustres B; Pérez-Elizalde S; Pérez-Rodríguez P
Theor Appl Genet; 2017 Jul; 130(7):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 28401254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing winter wheat prediction with genomics, phenomics and environmental data.
Montesinos-López OA; Herr AW; Crossa J; Montesinos-López A; Carter AH
BMC Genomics; 2024 May; 25(1):544. PubMed ID: 38822262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate genomic prediction of Coffea canephora in multiple environments using whole-genome statistical models.
Ferrão LFV; Ferrão RG; Ferrão MAG; Fonseca A; Carbonetto P; Stephens M; Garcia AAF
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Mar; 122(3):261-275. PubMed ID: 29941997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Converging phenomics and genomics to study natural variation in plant photosynthetic efficiency.
van Bezouw RFHM; Keurentjes JJB; Harbinson J; Aarts MGM
Plant J; 2019 Jan; 97(1):112-133. PubMed ID: 30548574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field-based high-throughput phenotyping enhances phenomic and genomic predictions for grain yield and plant height across years in maize.
Adak A; DeSalvio AJ; Arik MA; Murray SC
G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Jul; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 38776257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal phenomic predictions from unoccupied aerial systems can outperform genomic predictions.
Adak A; Murray SC; Anderson SL
G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
