142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35793228)
1. Ultrasound-guided repositioning technique for partially expelled intrauterine device: descriptive feasibility study.
Yamaguti EMM; Sontag Dos Reis ET; Martins WP; Nadai MN; Soares NF; da Silva Costa F; Vieira CS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 61(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 35793228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safe and cost-effective ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device: our experience.
Verma U; Astudillo-Dávalos FE; Gerkowicz SA
Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25708503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
O'Hanley K; Huber DH
Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-guided retrieval of lost intrauterine devices using very fine grasping forceps: a case series.
Moro F; Knez J; Pateman K; Derdelis G; Foo X; Jurkovic D
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2015 Jul; 41(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 25648937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery.
Dias T; Abeykoon S; Kumarasiri S; Gunawardena C; Padeniya T; D'Antonio F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25418016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound location of intrauterine devices placed at cesarean section over the first year postpartum.
Gonzalez J; Stimmel S; Rana R; Diggs AI; Pan S; Overbey J; Thomas AG; Lunde B
Contraception; 2020 Jun; 101(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 32201097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary report on a postpartum CuT 200 study, Santiago, Chile.
Lavin P; Waszak C; Bravo C
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 6133798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pilot clinical trial of ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device.
Hayes JL; Cwiak C; Goedken P; Zieman M
Contraception; 2007 Oct; 76(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 17900440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Removal of intrauterine devices with missing tails during early pregnancy.
Assaf A; Gohar M; Saad S; el-Nashar A; Abdel Aziz A
Contraception; 1992 Jun; 45(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 1617963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uterine dimensions and intrauterine device malposition: can ultrasound predict displacement or expulsion before it happens?
Çintesun FNİ; Çintesun E; Esenkaya Ü; Günenc O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Nov; 302(5):1181-1187. PubMed ID: 32748051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the type of intrauterine device affect conspicuity on 2D and 3D ultrasound?
Moschos E; Twickler DM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1439-43. PubMed ID: 21606311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The missing forgotten intrauterine contraceptive device.
Gruber A; Rabinerson D; Kaplan B; Pardo J; Neri A
Contraception; 1996 Aug; 54(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 8842589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of a simplified insertion technique for intrauterine devices.
Christenson K; Lerma K; Shaw KA; Blumenthal PD
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27113419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The lost IUD: don't look too far for it].
Nijhuis JG; Schijf CP; Eskes TK
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1985 Jul; 129(30):1409-10. PubMed ID: 3900746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.
Gurney EP; Sonalkar S; McAllister A; Sammel MD; Schreiber CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):183.e1-183.e9. PubMed ID: 29870737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
