These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35793953)

  • 1. [Evaluation of Detectability for Patient's Movement in Portable Chest Radiography: Comparison of Visual Detection and Motion Detection Software].
    Ono T; Ichikawa H; Kato T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Aug; 78(8):838-845. PubMed ID: 35793953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of Detectability for the New Image Processing and Conventional Image Processing by ROC Analysis: A Phantom Study of Chest Radiography].
    Kiriki M; Osaki T; Nakagawa H; Nakamura M; Fujikawa K; Nakamura K; Kikuchi K; Hama Y; Hagiwara Y; Kotoura N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 32074529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.
    Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 28(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20437132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
    Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 23827799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between the visual evaluation of pathology visibility and the physical measure of low contrast detail detectability in neonatal chest radiography.
    Al-Murshedi S; Benhalim M; Alzyoud K; Papathanasiou S; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Nov; 28(4):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 36099681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Flinck A; Ullman G; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):92-6. PubMed ID: 15933087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effects of Changing the Source-to-image Receptor Distance Parameter of Scattered X-ray Correction after Exposure on Image Quality in Portable Chest Radiography].
    Ijichi T; Matsushima M; Koga E; Kawahara Y; Tani K; Mio M; Obata A; Masumoto T; Kato S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Jul; 78(7):711-718. PubMed ID: 35675976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detectability of simulated interstitial pneumonia on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
    Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Kairada A; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 87(1040):20140075. PubMed ID: 24874767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Examination for Effectiveness of Scatter Correction in Portable Chest Radiography].
    Ichikawa H; Ono T; Sawane Y; Terabe M; Yamaguchi M; Shimada H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 72(12):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 28003607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
    Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.
    Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180317. PubMed ID: 29906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [ROC analysis for evaluating the detectability of image unsharpness due to the patient's movement: phantom study comparing preview and diagnostic LCDs].
    Tanaka R; Shiraishi J; Takamori M; Watari C
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(7):772-8. PubMed ID: 21799278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Diagnostic detection performance of a simulated nodule in chest computed tomography images and gray and color nuclear medicine images: comparison between a medical liquid crystal display monitor and an ordinary liquid crystal display monitor].
    Okumura E; Kamimae R; Miyashita K; Ueda R; Kanmae Y; Kubo M; Shirasaka N; Takeda T; Hashimoto N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Aug; 70(8):757-67. PubMed ID: 25142386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flat-panel detector computed tomography imaging: observer performance in detecting pulmonary nodules in comparison with conventional chest radiography and multidetector computed tomography.
    Otani H; Nitta N; Ikeda M; Nagatani Y; Tanaka T; Kitahara H; Murakami Y; Takahashi M; Murata K
    J Thorac Imaging; 2012 Jan; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21307781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.