These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35794178)

  • 1. Interplay between different forms of power and meritocratic considerations shapes fairness perceptions.
    Lois G; Riedl A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11428. PubMed ID: 35794178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Author Correction: Interplay between different forms of power and meritocratic considerations shapes fairness perceptions.
    Lois G; Riedl A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):1940. PubMed ID: 36732438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender, justice and work: a distributive approach to perceptions of housework fairness.
    Perales F; Baxter J; Tai TO
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 May; 51():51-63. PubMed ID: 25769851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement.
    Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 1998 Feb; 83(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9494438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power Heightens Sensitivity to Unfairness Against the Self.
    Sawaoka T; Hughes BL; Ambady N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1023-35. PubMed ID: 26048859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Of different minds: an accessible identity model of justice reasoning.
    Skitka LJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2003; 7(4):286-97. PubMed ID: 14633468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles.
    Tata J
    J Psychol; 2000 May; 134(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 10907704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The construction of feelings of justice in environmental management: An empirical study of multiple biodiversity conflicts in Calakmul, Mexico.
    Lecuyer L; White RM; Schmook B; Lemay V; Calmé S
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():363-373. PubMed ID: 29502021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From fair predictions to just decisions? Conceptualizing algorithmic fairness and distributive justice in the context of data-driven decision-making.
    Kuppler M; Kern C; Bach RL; Kreuter F
    Front Sociol; 2022; 7():883999. PubMed ID: 36299413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.
    Schminke M; Ambrose ML; Cropanzano RS
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Apr; 85(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 10783545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts.
    Cole ND; Latham GP
    J Appl Psychol; 1997 Oct; 82(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 9337606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.
    De Cremer D; Brockner J; Fishman A; van Dijke M; van Olffen W; Mayer DM
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Mar; 95(2):291-304. PubMed ID: 20230070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. I am entitled to it! Social power and context modulate disadvantageous inequity aversion.
    Hou Q; Meng L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Nov; 181():150-159. PubMed ID: 36154950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: a cross-cultural model.
    Syme GJ; Kals E; Nancarrow BE; Montada L
    Risk Anal; 2000 Dec; 20(6):905-16. PubMed ID: 11314739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
    Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trust in the Police during the Pro-Democracy Movement in Hong Kong: Psychosocial Factors of Perceived Procedural and Distributive Justice.
    Chan HCO
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions.
    Ambrose ML; Cropanzano R
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 12731710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator.
    Choi J
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):513-28. PubMed ID: 18457484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Powerful Individuals Behave Less Cooperatively in Common Resource Dilemmas When Treated Unfairly.
    Wang X; Wang M; Sun Q; Gao Q; Liu Y; Deng M
    Exp Psychol; 2019 May; 66(3):177-186. PubMed ID: 31266433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.