These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35794402)

  • 1. Kindergarteners Use Cross-Situational Statistics to Infer the Meaning of Grammatical Elements.
    Spit S; Andringa S; Rispens J; Aboh EO
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1311-1333. PubMed ID: 35794402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A universal cue for grammatical categories in the input to children: Frequent frames.
    Moran S; Blasi DE; Schikowski R; Küntay AC; Pfeiler B; Allen S; Stoll S
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():131-140. PubMed ID: 29518682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experience With a Linguistic Variant Affects the Acquisition of Its Sociolinguistic Meaning: An Alien-Language-Learning Experiment.
    Lai W; Rácz P; Roberts G
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Apr; 44(4):e12832. PubMed ID: 32246526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical distributional cues, but not situational cues, are readily used to learn abstract locative verb-structure associations.
    Twomey KE; Chang F; Ambridge B
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():124-39. PubMed ID: 27183399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical language learning: computational, maturational, and linguistic constraints.
    Newport EL
    Lang Cogn; 2016 Sep; 8(3):447-461. PubMed ID: 28680505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical evidence that a child can create a combinatorial linguistic system without external linguistic input: Implications for language evolution.
    Goldin-Meadow S; Yang C
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2017 Oct; 81(Pt B):150-157. PubMed ID: 28041786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Production efficiency can cause grammatical change: Learners deviate from the input to better balance efficiency against robust message transmission.
    Fedzechkina M; Jaeger TF
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104115. PubMed ID: 31790998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How children learn to communicate discriminatively.
    Ramscar M
    J Child Lang; 2021 Sep; 48(5):984-1022. PubMed ID: 34528502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large Language Models Demonstrate the Potential of Statistical Learning in Language.
    Contreras Kallens P; Kristensen-McLachlan RD; Christiansen MH
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Mar; 47(3):e13256. PubMed ID: 36840975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prosody, speech input and language acquisition].
    Jungheim M; Miller S; Kühn D; Ptok M
    HNO; 2014 Apr; 62(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 24633379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. There might be more to syntactic bootstrapping than being pragmatic: A look at grammatical person and prosody in naturalistic child-directed speech.
    Havron N; DE Carvalho A; Babineau M; Barbir M; Dautriche I; Christophe A
    J Child Lang; 2023 Sep; 50(5):1074-1078. PubMed ID: 36891934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children and Adults as Language Learners: Rules, Variation, and Maturational Change.
    Newport EL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Jan; 12(1):153-169. PubMed ID: 30834701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid infant learning of syntactic-semantic links.
    Barbir M; Babineau MJ; Fiévet AC; Christophe A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jan; 120(1):e2209153119. PubMed ID: 36574655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning a generative syntax from transparent syntactic atoms in the linguistic input.
    Ninio A
    J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1249-75. PubMed ID: 24229562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual statistical learning is related to natural language ability in adults: An ERP study.
    Daltrozzo J; Emerson SN; Deocampo J; Singh S; Freggens M; Branum-Martin L; Conway CM
    Brain Lang; 2017 Mar; 166():40-51. PubMed ID: 28086142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Miniature language system acquisition by children with different learning proficiencies.
    Johnston J; Blatchley M; Olness GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 2359274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding Structure in One Child's Linguistic Experience.
    Wang W; Vong WK; Kim N; Lake BM
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jun; 47(6):e13305. PubMed ID: 37358026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency.
    Culbertson J; Adger D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Apr; 111(16):5842-7. PubMed ID: 24706789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acquiring variation in an artificial language: Children and adults are sensitive to socially conditioned linguistic variation.
    Samara A; Smith K; Brown H; Wonnacott E
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 May; 94():85-114. PubMed ID: 28340356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Grammatical Structure Accelerate Number Word Learning? Evidence from Learners of Dual and Non-Dual Dialects of Slovenian.
    Marušič F; Žaucer R; Plesničar V; Razboršek T; Sullivan J; Barner D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159208. PubMed ID: 27486802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.