132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35794577)
1. Identifying intragenic functional modules of genomic variations associated with cancer phenotypes by learning representation of association networks.
Kim M; Huffman JE; Justice A; Goethert I; Agasthya G; ; Danciu I
BMC Med Genomics; 2022 Jul; 15(1):151. PubMed ID: 35794577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional genomics complements quantitative genetics in identifying disease-gene associations.
Guan Y; Ackert-Bicknell CL; Kell B; Troyanskaya OG; Hibbs MA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Nov; 6(11):e1000991. PubMed ID: 21085640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comprehensive Investigation of Genomic Variants in Prostate Cancer Reveals 30 Putative Regulatory Variants.
Labani M; Beheshti A; Argha A; Alinejad-Rokny H
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jan; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 36768794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tissue-specific network-based genome wide study of amygdala imaging phenotypes to identify functional interaction modules.
Yao X; Yan J; Liu K; Kim S; Nho K; Risacher SL; Greene CS; Moore JH; Saykin AJ; Shen L;
Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 33(20):3250-3257. PubMed ID: 28575147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aggressive prostate cancer phenotype and genome-wide association studies: where are we now?
Pinto AR; Silva J; Pinto R; Medeiros R
Pharmacogenomics; 2020 May; 21(7):487-503. PubMed ID: 32343194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferring disease and gene set associations with rank coherence in networks.
Hwang T; Zhang W; Xie M; Liu J; Kuang R
Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 27(19):2692-9. PubMed ID: 21824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genome-Wide Association Analyses in the Model Rhizobium
Epstein B; Abou-Shanab RAI; Shamseldin A; Taylor MR; Guhlin J; Burghardt LT; Nelson M; Sadowsky MJ; Tiffin P
mSphere; 2018 Oct; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30355664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Convergent network effects along the axis of gene expression during prostate cancer progression.
Charmpi K; Guo T; Zhong Q; Wagner U; Sun R; Toussaint NC; Fritz CE; Yuan C; Chen H; Rupp NJ; Christiansen A; Rutishauser D; Rüschoff JH; Fankhauser C; Saba K; Poyet C; Hermanns T; Oehl K; Moore AL; Beisel C; Calzone L; Martignetti L; Zhang Q; Zhu Y; Martínez MR; Manica M; Haffner MC; Aebersold R; Wild PJ; Beyer A
Genome Biol; 2020 Dec; 21(1):302. PubMed ID: 33317623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A polymorphism in the promoter of FRAS1 is a candidate SNP associated with metastatic prostate cancer.
Wang V; Geybels MS; Jordahl KM; Gerke T; Hamid A; Penney KL; Markt SC; Freedman M; Pomerantz M; Lee GM; Rana H; Börnigen D; Rebbeck TR; Huttenhower C; Eeles RA; Stanford JL; Consortium P; Berndt SI; Claessens F; Sørensen KD; Park JY; Vega A; Usmani N; Mucci L; Sweeney CJ
Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):683-693. PubMed ID: 33956343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrative pathway analysis of genome-wide association studies and gene expression data in prostate cancer.
Jia P; Liu Y; Zhao Z
BMC Syst Biol; 2012; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S13. PubMed ID: 23281744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathway Analysis of Genes Identified through Post-GWAS to Underpin Prostate Cancer Aetiology.
Farashi S; Kryza T; Batra J
Genes (Basel); 2020 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 32397189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome-wide copy number analysis reveals candidate gene loci that confer susceptibility to high-grade prostate cancer.
Poniah P; Mohd Zain S; Abdul Razack AH; Kuppusamy S; Karuppayah S; Sian Eng H; Mohamed Z
Urol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):545.e1-545.e11. PubMed ID: 28527622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A genome-wide survey over the ChIP-on-chip identified androgen receptor-binding genomic regions identifies a novel prostate cancer susceptibility locus at 12q13.13.
Feng J; Sun J; Kim ST; Lu Y; Wang Z; Zhang Z; Gronberg H; Isaacs WB; Zheng SL; Xu J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Nov; 20(11):2396-403. PubMed ID: 21960693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-GWAS in prostate cancer: from genetic association to biological contribution.
Farashi S; Kryza T; Clements J; Batra J
Nat Rev Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 30538273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single cell genomics reveals activation signatures of endogenous SCAR's networks in aneuploid human embryos and clinically intractable malignant tumors.
Glinsky GV
Cancer Lett; 2016 Oct; 381(1):176-93. PubMed ID: 27497790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic associations of breast and prostate cancer are enriched for regulatory elements identified in disease-related tissues.
Chen H; Kichaev G; Bien SA; MacDonald JW; Wang L; Bammler TK; Auer P; Pasaniuc B; Lindström S
Hum Genet; 2019 Oct; 138(10):1091-1104. PubMed ID: 31230194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leveraging multiple gene networks to prioritize GWAS candidate genes via network representation learning.
Wu M; Zeng W; Liu W; Lv H; Chen T; Jiang R
Methods; 2018 Aug; 145():41-50. PubMed ID: 29874547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel Synthetic phenotype association study approach reveals the landscape of association for genomic variants and phenotypes.
Škrabišová M; Dietz N; Zeng S; Chan YO; Wang J; Liu Y; Biová J; Joshi T; Bilyeu KD
J Adv Res; 2022 Dec; 42():117-133. PubMed ID: 36513408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome scan study of prostate cancer in Arabs: identification of three genomic regions with multiple prostate cancer susceptibility loci in Tunisians.
Shan J; Al-Rumaihi K; Rabah D; Al-Bozom I; Kizhakayil D; Farhat K; Al-Said S; Kfoury H; Dsouza SP; Rowe J; Khalak HG; Jafri S; Aigha II; Chouchane L
J Transl Med; 2013 May; 11():121. PubMed ID: 23668334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. NetCore: a network propagation approach using node coreness.
Barel G; Herwig R
Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Sep; 48(17):e98. PubMed ID: 32735660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
