141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35794796)
1. In Vivo Evidence of Early Instability and Late Stabilization in Motion Segments Immediately Superior to Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis.
Chen SR; LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn S; Munsch MA; Couch BK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Sep; 47(17):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 35794796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgery-related Factors Do Not Affect Short-term Adjacent Segment Kinematics After Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis.
Chen SR; LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn S; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Dec; 46(23):1630-1636. PubMed ID: 33907081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.
Yeni YN; Baumer T; Oravec D; Basheer A; McDonald CP; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of pathology and one-level versus two-level arthrodesis on cervical spine intervertebral helical axis of motion.
LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn SW; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
J Biomech; 2022 Mar; 133():110960. PubMed ID: 35074698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.
Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Liu H; Wang BY; Hong Y; Rong X; Ding C; Chen H
Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 30742975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intervertebral kinematics during neck motion 6.5 years after fusion and artificial disc replacement.
Yeni YN; Azad S; Oravec D; Schildcrout A; Basheer A; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Oct; 99():105756. PubMed ID: 36063742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal Study of the Six Degrees of Freedom Cervical Spine Range of Motion During Dynamic Flexion, Extension, and Rotation After Single-level Anterior Arthrodesis.
Anderst WJ; West T; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Nov; 41(22):E1319-E1327. PubMed ID: 27831986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 24210579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion.
Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Konar S; Sharma A
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E5. PubMed ID: 28142281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Fate of Adjacent Segments After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Influence of an Anterior Plate System.
Ahn SS; Paik HK; Chin DK; Kim SH; Kim DW; Ku MG
World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():42-50. PubMed ID: 26828457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.
Shin DA; Yi S; Yoon DH; Kim KN; Shin HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 19444062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In Vivo Changes in Dynamic Adjacent Segment Motion 1 Year After One and Two-Level Cervical Arthrodesis.
LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn SW; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 50(7):871-881. PubMed ID: 35397715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.
Welke B; Schwarze M; Hurschler C; Book T; Magdu S; Daentzer D
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 26684468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cervical kinematics between patients with cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc herniation.
Lee JH; Kim JS; Lee JH; Chung ER; Shim CS; Lee SH
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1199-204. PubMed ID: 24183464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
