These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35795407)

  • 21. Novel dynamic fuzzy Decision-Making framework for COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients.
    Albahri OS; Zaidan AA; Albahri AS; Alsattar HA; Mohammed R; Aickelin U; Kou G; Jumaah FM; Salih MM; Alamoodi AH; Zaidan BB; Alazab M; Alnoor A; Al-Obaidi JR
    J Adv Res; 2022 Mar; 37():147-168. PubMed ID: 35475277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of Influenza Intervention Strategies in Turkey with Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR.
    Samanlioglu F
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():9486070. PubMed ID: 31827743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multifunctional resilience of river health to human service demand in an alluvial quarried reach: a comparison amongst fuzzy logic, entropy, and AHP-based MCDM models.
    Bhattacharya RK; Das Chatterjee N; Das K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(56):84137-84165. PubMed ID: 35776302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
    Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance Evaluation of Construction Companies Using Integrated Entropy-Fuzzy VIKOR Model.
    Lam WS; Lam WH; Jaaman SH; Liew KF
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Mar; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 33800468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Supplier selection in healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy rough decision-making approach.
    Pamucar D; Torkayesh AE; Biswas S
    Ann Oper Res; 2022 Jan; ():1-43. PubMed ID: 35039705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On SIR-based MCDM approach: Selecting a charcoal firm using hybrid fuzzy number on a Triple Vague structure.
    Rajadurai M; Kaliyaperumal P
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24248. PubMed ID: 38293499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets.
    Ma Q; Sun H; Chen Z; Tan Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294596. PubMed ID: 38011124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GIS-based MCDM modeling for landfill site suitability analysis: A comprehensive review of the literature.
    Özkan B; Özceylan E; Sarıçiçek İ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(30):30711-30730. PubMed ID: 31493083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Digital Technology Strategies in COVID-19 Pandemic Under Uncertainty.
    Salimian S; Mousavi SM
    Arab J Sci Eng; 2023; 48(5):7005-7017. PubMed ID: 36090763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the treatment options for COVID-19 patients using generalized hesitant fuzzy- multi criteria decision making techniques.
    Nandi S; Granata G; Jana S; Ghorui N; Mondal SP; Bhaumik M
    Socioecon Plann Sci; 2023 Aug; 88():101614. PubMed ID: 37346799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Multicriteria Decision-Making Framework for Access Point Selection in Hybrid LiFi/WiFi Networks Using Integrated AHP-VIKOR Technique.
    Badeel R; Subramaniam SK; Muhammed A; Hanapi ZM
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Emergency System in COVID-19 Pandemic. An Extensive Narrative Review.
    Clemente-Suárez VJ; Navarro-Jiménez E; Ruisoto P; Dalamitros AA; Beltran-Velasco AI; Hormeño-Holgado A; Laborde-Cárdenas CC; Tornero-Aguilera JF
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
    Kiracı K; Akan E
    J Air Transp Manag; 2020 Oct; 89():101924. PubMed ID: 32989347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pandemic hospital site selection: a GIS-based MCDM approach employing Pythagorean fuzzy sets.
    Boyacı AÇ; Şişman A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(2):1985-1997. PubMed ID: 34357491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An enhanced VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision-making with complex Fermatean fuzzy sets.
    Akram M; Muhiuddin G; Santos-García G
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 May; 19(7):7201-7231. PubMed ID: 35730303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Post-COVID-19 ergonomic school furniture design under fuzzy logic.
    Incekara CO
    Work; 2021; 69(4):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 34459430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Hybrid Fuzzy Decision Model for Evaluating MEMS and IC Integration Technologies.
    Lee QY; Lee MX; Lee YC
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33799935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A decision-making framework for COVID-19 infodemic management strategies evaluation in spherical fuzzy environment.
    Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi S; Bonab SR; Ghiaci AM
    Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess; 2023; 37(4):1635-1648. PubMed ID: 36714449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.