These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35796228)

  • 1. Dynamic Docking of Macrocycles in Bound and Unbound Protein Structures with DynaDock.
    Meixner M; Zachmann M; Metzler S; Scheerer J; Zacharias M; Antes I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jul; 62(14):3426-3441. PubMed ID: 35796228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the bioactive conformations of macrocycles: a molecular dynamics-based docking procedure with DynaDock.
    Ugur I; Schroft M; Marion A; Glaser M; Antes I
    J Mol Model; 2019 Jun; 25(7):197. PubMed ID: 31222506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting bioactive conformations and binding modes of macrocycles.
    Anighoro A; de la Vega de León A; Bajorath J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Oct; 30(10):841-849. PubMed ID: 27655412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling the binding mode of macrocycles: Docking and conformational sampling.
    Martin SJ; Chen IJ; Chan AWE; Foloppe N
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2020 Jan; 28(1):115143. PubMed ID: 31771798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Docking of Macrocycles: Comparing Rigid and Flexible Docking in Glide.
    Alogheli H; Olanders G; Schaal W; Brandt P; Karlén A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):190-202. PubMed ID: 28079375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo replica-exchange based ensemble docking of protein conformations.
    Zhang Z; Ehmann U; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2017 May; 85(5):924-937. PubMed ID: 28168752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Energy penalties enhance flexible receptor docking in a model cavity.
    Kamenik AS; Singh I; Lak P; Balius TE; Liedl KR; Shoichet BK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(36):. PubMed ID: 34475217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.
    Lorber DM; Udo MK; Shoichet BK
    Protein Sci; 2002 Jun; 11(6):1393-408. PubMed ID: 12021438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Docking rigid macrocycles using Convex-PL, AutoDock Vina, and RDKit in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.
    Kadukova M; Chupin V; Grudinin S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Feb; 34(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 31784861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plasticity of the Binding Site of Renin: Optimized Selection of Protein Structures for Ensemble Docking.
    Strecker C; Meyer B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 May; 58(5):1121-1131. PubMed ID: 29683661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Higher Accuracy Achieved for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction by Elastic Network Model-Based Ensemble Docking.
    Wang A; Zhang Y; Chu H; Liao C; Zhang Z; Li G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2939-2950. PubMed ID: 32383873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility.
    Antes I
    Proteins; 2010 Apr; 78(5):1084-104. PubMed ID: 20017216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations.
    Feher M; Williams CI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1704-14. PubMed ID: 19530660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BP-Dock: a flexible docking scheme for exploring protein-ligand interactions based on unbound structures.
    Bolia A; Gerek ZN; Ozkan SB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):913-25. PubMed ID: 24380381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting protein conformational changes for unbound and homology docking: learning from intrinsic and induced flexibility.
    Chen H; Sun Y; Shen Y
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):544-556. PubMed ID: 27862345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics.
    Campbell AJ; Lamb ML; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2127-38. PubMed ID: 24881672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles.
    Lorber DM; Shoichet BK
    Protein Sci; 1998 Apr; 7(4):938-50. PubMed ID: 9568900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A flexible docking scheme to explore the binding selectivity of PDZ domains.
    Gerek ZN; Ozkan SB
    Protein Sci; 2010 May; 19(5):914-28. PubMed ID: 20196074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conformational Heterogeneity of Unbound Proteins Enhances Recognition in Protein-Protein Encounters.
    Pallara C; Rueda M; Abagyan R; Fernández-Recio J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jul; 12(7):3236-49. PubMed ID: 27294484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
    Wu Y; Brooks CL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.