211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35796594)
1. Curation of a reference database of COI sequences for insect identification through DNA metabarcoding: COins.
Magoga G; Forni G; Brunetti M; Meral A; Spada A; De Biase A; Montagna M
Database (Oxford); 2022 Jul; 2022():. PubMed ID: 35796594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Be positive: customized reference databases and new, local barcodes balance false taxonomic assignments in metabarcoding studies.
Mugnai F; Costantini F; Chenuil A; Leduc M; Gutiérrez Ortega JM; Meglécz E
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14616. PubMed ID: 36643652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A detailed workflow to develop QIIME2-formatted reference databases for taxonomic analysis of DNA metabarcoding data.
Dubois B; Debode F; Hautier L; Hulin J; Martin GS; Delvaux A; Janssen E; Mingeot D
BMC Genom Data; 2022 Jul; 23(1):53. PubMed ID: 35804326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of BOLD and GenBank - Their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials.
Meiklejohn KA; Damaso N; Robertson JM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217084. PubMed ID: 31216285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tiny insects, big troubles: a review of BOLD's COI database for Thysanoptera (Insecta).
Lindner MF; Gonçalves LT; Bianchi FM; Ferrari A; Cavalleri A
Bull Entomol Res; 2023 Oct; 113(5):703-715. PubMed ID: 37614126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MARES, a replicable pipeline and curated reference database for marine eukaryote metabarcoding.
Arranz V; Pearman WS; Aguirre JD; Liggins L
Sci Data; 2020 Jul; 7(1):209. PubMed ID: 32620910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. taxalogue: a toolkit to create comprehensive CO1 reference databases.
Noll NW; Scherber C; Schäffler L
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16253. PubMed ID: 38077427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New mitochondrial primers for metabarcoding of insects, designed and evaluated using in silico methods.
Marquina D; Andersson AF; Ronquist F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 30226026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biodiversity assessments in the 21st century: the potential of insect traps to complement environmental samples for estimating eukaryotic and prokaryotic diversity using high-throughput DNA metabarcoding
Ritter CD; Häggqvist S; Karlsson D; Sääksjärvi IE; Muasya AM; Nilsson RH; Antonelli A
Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):147-159. PubMed ID: 30673361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using DNA metabarcoding to assess insect diversity in citrus orchards.
Liu C; Ashfaq M; Yin Y; Zhu Y; Wang Z; Cheng H; Hebert P
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15338. PubMed ID: 37168534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. crabs-A software program to generate curated reference databases for metabarcoding sequencing data.
Jeunen GJ; Dowle E; Edgecombe J; von Ammon U; Gemmell NJ; Cross H
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Apr; 23(3):725-738. PubMed ID: 36437603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Taxonomic identification accuracy from BOLD and GenBank databases using over a thousand insect DNA barcodes from Colombia.
Baena-Bejarano N; Reina C; Martínez-Revelo DE; Medina CA; Tovar E; Uribe-Soto S; Neita-Moreno JC; Gonzalez MA
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0277379. PubMed ID: 37093820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. coil: an R package for cytochrome
Nugent CM; Elliott TA; Ratnasingham S; Adamowicz SJ
Genome; 2020 Jun; 63(6):291-305. PubMed ID: 32406757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Just keep it simple? Benchmarking the accuracy of taxonomy assignment software in metabarcoding studies.
Bik HM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Oct; 21(7):2187-2189. PubMed ID: 34268901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BAGS: An automated Barcode, Audit & Grade System for DNA barcode reference libraries.
Fontes JT; Vieira PE; Ekrem T; Soares P; Costa FO
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Feb; 21(2):573-583. PubMed ID: 33000878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MetaZooGene Atlas and Database: Reference Sequences for Marine Ecosystems.
O'Brien TD; Blanco-Bercial L; Questel JM; Batta-Lona PG; Bucklin A
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2744():475-489. PubMed ID: 38683336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indigenous species barcode database improves the identification of zooplankton.
Yang J; Zhang X; Zhang W; Sun J; Xie Y; Zhang Y; Burton GA; Yu H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185697. PubMed ID: 28977035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of DNA metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphological approach in the identification of host-parasitoid interactions.
Šigut M; Kostovčík M; Šigutová H; Hulcr J; Drozd P; Hrček J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0187803. PubMed ID: 29236697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for the Analysis of DNA Barcoding/Metabarcoding Sequencing Data and Interpretation of Publicly Available Databases.
Damaso N; Elwick KE; Robertson JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2744():391-402. PubMed ID: 38683333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match.
Deagle BE; Jarman SN; Coissac E; Pompanon F; Taberlet P
Biol Lett; 2014 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 25209199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
