165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35797513)
21. A bioink blend for rotary 3D bioprinting tissue engineered small-diameter vascular constructs.
Freeman S; Ramos R; Alexis Chando P; Zhou L; Reeser K; Jin S; Soman P; Ye K
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():152-164. PubMed ID: 31271883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tricomposite gelatin-carboxymethylcellulose-alginate bioink for direct and indirect 3D printing of human knee meniscal scaffold.
P B S; S G; J P; Muthusamy S; R N; Krishnakumar GS; R S
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Jan; 195():179-189. PubMed ID: 34863969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A tunable gelatin-hyaluronan dialdehyde/methacryloyl gelatin interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel for additive tissue manufacturing.
Anand R; Salar Amoli M; Huysecom AS; Amorim PA; Agten H; Geris L; Bloemen V
Biomed Mater; 2022 Jun; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 35700719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Precise Printing of Microfiber Scaffold with Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA)/Polyethylene Oxide (PEO) Bioink.
Li H; Zhou R; Shu Q; Xie M; He Y
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 36829624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biocompatibility evaluation of a 3D-bioprinted alginate-GelMA-bacteria nanocellulose (BNC) scaffold laden with oriented-growth RSC96 cells.
Wu Z; Xie S; Kang Y; Shan X; Li Q; Cai Z
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Oct; 129():112393. PubMed ID: 34579912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A skeleton muscle model using GelMA-based cell-aligned bioink processed with an electric-field assisted 3D/4D bioprinting.
Yang GH; Kim W; Kim J; Kim G
Theranostics; 2021; 11(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 33391460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 3D Bioprinting Using Cross-Linker-Free Silk-Gelatin Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.
Singh YP; Bandyopadhyay A; Mandal BB
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Sep; 11(37):33684-33696. PubMed ID: 31453678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration.
Ruiz-Cantu L; Gleadall A; Faris C; Segal J; Shakesheff K; Yang J
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Apr; 109():110578. PubMed ID: 32228894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development and evaluation of a multicomponent bioink consisting of alginate, gelatin, diethylaminoethyl cellulose and collagen peptide for 3D bioprinting of tissue construct for drug screening application.
Geevarghese R; Somasekharan LT; Bhatt A; Kasoju N; Nair RP
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 May; 207():278-288. PubMed ID: 35257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Double network laminarin-boronic/alginate dynamic bioink for 3D bioprinting cell-laden constructs.
Amaral AJR; Gaspar VM; Lavrador P; Mano JF
Biofabrication; 2021 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 34075894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.
Ouyang L; Yao R; Zhao Y; Sun W
Biofabrication; 2016 Sep; 8(3):035020. PubMed ID: 27634915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nanoparticle-Stabilized Emulsion Bioink for Digital Light Processing Based 3D Bioprinting of Porous Tissue Constructs.
Tao J; Zhu S; Zhou N; Wang Y; Wan H; Zhang L; Tang Y; Pan Y; Yang Y; Zhang J; Liu R
Adv Healthc Mater; 2022 Jun; 11(12):e2102810. PubMed ID: 35194975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 3D bioprinting optimization of human mesenchymal stromal cell laden gelatin-alginate-collagen bioink.
Sawyer SW; Takeda K; Alayoubi A; Mirdamadi E; Zidan A; Bauer SR; Degheidy H
Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 36395510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. GelMA/bioactive silica nanocomposite bioinks for stem cell osteogenic differentiation.
Tavares MT; Gaspar VM; Monteiro MV; S Farinha JP; Baleizão C; Mano JF
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33455952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Engineering bioprintable alginate/gelatin composite hydrogels with tunable mechanical and cell adhesive properties to modulate tumor spheroid growth kinetics.
Jiang T; Munguia-Lopez JG; Gu K; Bavoux MM; Flores-Torres S; Kort-Mascort J; Grant J; Vijayakumar S; De Leon-Rodriguez A; Ehrlicher AJ; Kinsella JM
Biofabrication; 2019 Dec; 12(1):015024. PubMed ID: 31404917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Phage as versatile nanoink for printing 3-D cell-laden scaffolds.
Lee DY; Lee H; Kim Y; Yoo SY; Chung WJ; Kim G
Acta Biomater; 2016 Jan; 29():112-124. PubMed ID: 26441128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An approach for mechanical property optimization of cell-laden alginate-gelatin composite bioink with bioactive glass nanoparticles.
Wei L; Li Z; Li J; Zhang Y; Yao B; Liu Y; Song W; Fu X; Wu X; Huang S
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2020 Nov; 31(11):103. PubMed ID: 33140191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Engineering gelatin-based alginate/carbon nanotubes blend bioink for direct 3D printing of vessel constructs.
Li L; Qin S; Peng J; Chen A; Nie Y; Liu T; Song K
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Feb; 145():262-271. PubMed ID: 31870866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
