These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35798148)
1. Low-cost ceramic membrane bioreactor: Effect of backwashing, relaxation and aeration on fouling. Protozoa and bacteria removal. Ugarte P; Ramo A; Quílez J; Bordes MDC; Mestre S; Sánchez E; Peña JÁ; Menéndez M Chemosphere; 2022 Nov; 306():135587. PubMed ID: 35798148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periodic fouling control strategies in gravity-driven membrane bioreactors (GD-MBRs): Impact on treatment performance and membrane fouling properties. Ranieri L; Vrouwenvelder JS; Fortunato L Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 3):156340. PubMed ID: 35654208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse. Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of long-term ceramic membrane bioreactors without and with in-situ ozonation in wastewater treatment: Membrane fouling, effluent quality and microbial community. Tang S; Li J; Zhang Z; Ren B; Zhang X Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():788-799. PubMed ID: 30380486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-flux operation of MBRs with ceramic flat-sheet membranes made possible by intensive membrane cleaning: Tests with real domestic wastewater under low-temperature conditions. Ninomiya Y; Kimura K; Sato T; Kakuda T; Kaneda M; Hafuka A; Tsuchiya T Water Res; 2020 Aug; 181():115881. PubMed ID: 32438119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of food waste recycling wastewater using anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor for biogas production in mainstream treatment process of domestic wastewater. Jeong Y; Hermanowicz SW; Park C Water Res; 2017 Oct; 123():86-95. PubMed ID: 28651084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of dissolved organic matters (DOMs) on membrane fouling in anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactors (AnCMBRs) treating domestic wastewater. Yue X; Koh YK; Ng HY Water Res; 2015 Dec; 86():96-107. PubMed ID: 26255104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance assessment of the indigenous ceramic UF membrane in bioreactor process for highly polluted tannery wastewater treatment. Banerjee S; Santra B; Kar S; Banerjee D; Ghosh S; Majumdar S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(32):48620-48637. PubMed ID: 35199268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimising the operation of a MBR pilot plant by quantitative analysis of the membrane fouling mechanism. Jiang T; Kennedy MD; Guinzbourg BF; Vanrolleghem PA; Schippers JC Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):19-25. PubMed ID: 16003957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electroconductive moving bed membrane bioreactor (EcMB-MBR) for single-step decentralized wastewater treatment: Performance, mechanisms, and cost. Udomkittayachai N; Xue W; Xiao K; Visvanathan C; Tabucanon AS Water Res; 2021 Jan; 188():116547. PubMed ID: 33126002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the effect of air flow rate on hybrid and conventional membrane bioreactors: Implications on performance, microbial activity and membrane fouling. Belli TJ; Bassin JP; Costa RE; Akaboci TRV; Battistelli AA; Lobo-Recio MA; Lapolli FR Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 755(Pt 2):142563. PubMed ID: 33059133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between novel vibrating ceramic MBR and conventional air-sparging MBR for domestic wastewater treatment: Performance, fouling control and energy consumption. Wang C; Ng TCA; Ng HY Water Res; 2021 Sep; 203():117521. PubMed ID: 34391023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interplay role of microalgae and bio-carriers in hybrid membrane bioreactors on wastewater treatment, membrane fouling, and microbial communities. Radmehr S; Kallioinen-Mänttäri M; Mänttäri M Environ Pollut; 2023 Dec; 339():122764. PubMed ID: 37852316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fouling characteristics and cleaning strategies of NF membranes for the advanced treatment of antibiotic production wastewater. Wang J; Li K; Yu D; Zhang J; Wei Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Apr; 24(10):8967-8977. PubMed ID: 26381786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Membrane fouling mitigation by NaClO-assisted backwash in anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of domestic wastewater. Yue X; Koh YKK; Ng HY Bioresour Technol; 2018 Nov; 268():622-632. PubMed ID: 30138875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of relaxation modes on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Habib R; Asif MB; Iftekhar S; Khan Z; Gurung K; Srivastava V; Sillanpää M Chemosphere; 2017 Aug; 181():19-25. PubMed ID: 28414955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fouling characteristics in different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors. Jin L; Ong SL; Ng HY Water Res; 2010 Dec; 44(20):5907-18. PubMed ID: 20709347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Membrane Pore Size on Membrane Fouling of Corundum Ceramic Membrane in MBR. Huang R; Pan H; Zheng X; Fan C; Si W; Bao D; Gao S; Tian J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensive membrane cleaning for MBRs equipped with flat-sheet ceramic membranes: Controlling negative effects of chemical reagents used for membrane cleaning. Kimura K; Uchida H Water Res; 2019 Mar; 150():21-28. PubMed ID: 30503871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowledge-based system for automatic MBR control. Comas J; Meabe E; Sancho L; Ferrero G; Sipma J; Monclús H; Rodriguez-Roda I Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(12):2829-36. PubMed ID: 21123912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]