These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35798216)

  • 1. Torrent frogs emit acoustic signals of a narrower spectral range in habitats with longer-lasting biotic background noise.
    Forti LR; de Melo Sampaio MR; Pires CR; Szabo JK; Toledo LF
    Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104700. PubMed ID: 35798216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How the environment shapes animal signals: a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs.
    Goutte S; Dubois A; Howard SD; Márquez R; Rowley JJL; Dehling JM; Grandcolas P; Xiong RC; Legendre F
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Jan; 31(1):148-158. PubMed ID: 29150984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.
    Muñoz MI; Penna M
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jul; 202(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 27209276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental constraints and call evolution in torrent-dwelling frogs.
    Goutte S; Dubois A; Howard SD; Marquez R; Rowley JJ; Dehling JM; Grandcolas P; Rongchuan X; Legendre F
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):811-26. PubMed ID: 26960074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biological invasions and the acoustic niche: the effect of bullfrog calls on the acoustic signals of white-banded tree frogs.
    Both C; Grant T
    Biol Lett; 2012 Oct; 8(5):714-6. PubMed ID: 22675139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs.
    Amézquita A; Flechas SV; Lima AP; Gasser H; Hödl W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Oct; 108(41):17058-63. PubMed ID: 21969562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stream noise, hybridization, and uncoupled evolution of call traits in two lineages of poison frogs: Oophaga histrionica and Oophaga lehmanni.
    Vargas-Salinas F; Amézquita A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77545. PubMed ID: 24194888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasonic frogs call at a higher pitch in noisier ambiance.
    Zhang F; Chen P; Chen Z; Zhao J
    Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):996-1003. PubMed ID: 32256536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system in the Amazonian dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis.
    Amézquita A; Hödl W; Lima AP; Castellanos L; Erdtmann L; de Araújo MC
    Evolution; 2006 Sep; 60(9):1874-87. PubMed ID: 17089972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae).
    Hepp F; Pombal JPJ
    Zootaxa; 2020 Jan; 4725(1):zootaxa.4725.1.1. PubMed ID: 32230594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neotropical frogs and mating songs: The evolution of advertisement calls in glassfrogs.
    Escalona Sulbarán MD; Ivo Simões P; Gonzalez-Voyer A; Castroviejo-Fisher S
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Feb; 32(2):163-176. PubMed ID: 30481406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs.
    Goutte S; Mason MJ; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Montealegre-Z F; Chivers BD; Sarria-S FA; Antoniazzi MM; Jared C; Almeida Sato L; Felipe Toledo L
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12121. PubMed ID: 28935936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multimodal signaling in the Small Torrent Frog (
    Preininger D; Boeckle M; Freudmann A; Starnberger I; Sztatecsny M; Hödl W
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2013; 67(9):1449-1456. PubMed ID: 23956486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two Neotropical hylid frogs.
    Caorsi VZ; Both C; Cechin S; Antunes R; Borges-Martins M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183342. PubMed ID: 28854253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lung mediated auditory contrast enhancement improves the Signal-to-noise ratio for communication in frogs.
    Lee N; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; White LA; Schrode KM; Bee MA
    Curr Biol; 2021 Apr; 31(7):1488-1498.e4. PubMed ID: 33667371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amplification and spectral shifts of vocalizations inside burrows of the frog Eupsophus calcaratus (Leptodactylidae).
    Penna M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1254-60. PubMed ID: 15376690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice.
    Köhler J; Jansen M; Rodríguez A; Kok PJR; Toledo LF; Emmrich M; Glaw F; Haddad CFB; Rödel MO; Vences M
    Zootaxa; 2017 Apr; 4251(1):1-124. PubMed ID: 28609991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using citizen science to test for acoustic niche partitioning in frogs.
    Allen-Ankins S; Schwarzkopf L
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2447. PubMed ID: 35165349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.
    Lee N; Ward JL; Vélez A; Micheyl C; Bee MA
    Curr Biol; 2017 Mar; 27(5):743-750. PubMed ID: 28238657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.