130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35798257)
1. The prognostic value of machine learning techniques versus cox regression model for head and neck cancer.
Peng J; Lu Y; Chen L; Qiu K; Chen F; Liu J; Xu W; Zhang W; Zhao Y; Yu Z; Ren J
Methods; 2022 Sep; 205():123-132. PubMed ID: 35798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized postoperative chemotherapy: A real-world study of distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Wang D; Pan B; Huang JC; Chen Q; Cui SP; Lang R; Lyu SC
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1106029. PubMed ID: 37007095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial intelligence to predict outcomes of head and neck radiotherapy.
Bang C; Bernard G; Le WT; Lalonde A; Kadoury S; Bahig H
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2023 Mar; 39():100590. PubMed ID: 36935854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms to Cox Regression in Predicting the Survival of Oral and Pharyngeal Cancers: Analyses Based on SEER Database.
Du M; Haag DG; Lynch JW; Mittinty MN
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 33003533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine Learning and Nomogram Prognostic Modeling for 2-Year Head and Neck Cancer-Specific Survival Using Electronic Health Record Data: A Multisite Study.
Kotevski DP; Smee RI; Vajdic CM; Field M
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2023 Jan; 7():e2200128. PubMed ID: 36596211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Xiao J; Mo M; Wang Z; Zhou C; Shen J; Yuan J; He Y; Zheng Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e33440. PubMed ID: 35179504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep learning models for predicting the survival of patients with chondrosarcoma based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.
Yan L; Gao N; Ai F; Zhao Y; Kang Y; Chen J; Weng Y
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():967758. PubMed ID: 36072795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognosis prediction for glioblastoma multiforme patients using machine learning approaches: Development of the clinically applicable model.
Kim Y; Kim KH; Park J; Yoon HI; Sung W
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109617. PubMed ID: 36921767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine learning versus logistic regression for prognostic modelling in individuals with non-specific neck pain.
Liew BXW; Kovacs FM; Rügamer D; Royuela A
Eur Spine J; 2022 Aug; 31(8):2082-2091. PubMed ID: 35353221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of lung papillary adenocarcinoma-specific survival using ensemble machine learning models.
Xia K; Chen D; Jin S; Yi X; Luo L
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14827. PubMed ID: 37684259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying potential prognostic biomarkers in head and neck cancer based on the analysis of microRNA expression profiles in TCGA database.
Wang X; Yin Z; Zhao Y; He M; Dong C; Zhong M
Mol Med Rep; 2020 Mar; 21(3):1647-1657. PubMed ID: 32016476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple Machine Learnings Revealed Similar Predictive Accuracy for Prognosis of PNETs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Database.
Song Y; Gao S; Tan W; Qiu Z; Zhou H; Zhao Y
J Cancer; 2018; 9(21):3971-3978. PubMed ID: 30410601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors and prognostic nomogram for patients with second primary cancers after lung cancer using classical statistics and machine learning.
Luo L; Lin H; Huang J; Lin B; Huang F; Luo H
Clin Exp Med; 2023 Sep; 23(5):1609-1620. PubMed ID: 35821159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.
Ye Z; An S; Gao Y; Xie E; Zhao X; Guo Z; Li Y; Shen N; Ren J; Zheng J
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Jan; 28(1):33. PubMed ID: 36653875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of survival prediction model for gastric adenocarcinoma patients using deep learning: A SEER-based study.
Zeng J; Li K; Cao F; Zheng Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1131859. PubMed ID: 36959782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer.
Humbert-Vidan L; Patel V; Oksuz I; King AP; Guerrero Urbano T
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20200026. PubMed ID: 33684314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dementia risk prediction in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a comparison of Cox regression and machine learning models.
Wang M; Greenberg M; Forkert ND; Chekouo T; Afriyie G; Ismail Z; Smith EE; Sajobi TT
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):284. PubMed ID: 36324086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay
Wu JY; Lin Y; Lin K; Hu YH; Kong GL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Dec; 53(6):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 34916699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
