121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35799361)
1. Correlation of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake values on PET-CT scan with histological prognostic markers in breast cancer.
Muduly DK; Ephraim R; Sultania M; Ray S; Bhoriwal S; Pathak M; Kar M
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 19(2):e106-e110. PubMed ID: 35799361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolic activity of breast cancer metastatic lesions on positron emission tomography/computed tomography: comparison with histological and biological characteristics of primary tumor.
Sobic Saranovic D; Stojiljkovic M; Susnjar S; Odalovic S; Artiko V; Pavlovic S; Grozdic-Milojevic I; Obradovic V
Neoplasma; 2016; 63(2):313-21. PubMed ID: 26774154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships of
Sengoz T; Karakaya YA; Gultekin A; Yaylali O; Senol H; Yuksel D
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2022; 41(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 34991834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subtype-Guided
Wu S; Wang Y; Li J; Zhang N; Mo M; Klimberg S; Kaklamani V; Cochet A; Shao Z; Cheng J; Liu G
Oncologist; 2020 Apr; 25(4):e626-e633. PubMed ID: 32297448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prognostic value of SUV
Diao W; Tian F; Jia Z
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():1-7. PubMed ID: 30017264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer.
Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of pretreatment
Han S; Lee SB; Gong G; Lee J; Chae SY; Oh JS; Moon DH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Apr; 198(2):207-215. PubMed ID: 36633721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased FDG uptake in breast cancer is associated with prognostic factors.
Sanli Y; Kuyumcu S; Ozkan ZG; Işik G; Karanlik H; Guzelbey B; Turkmen C; Ozel S; Yavuz E; Mudun A
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 May; 26(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 22359222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of
Önner H; Coskun N; Erol M; Eren Karanis Mİ
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2022; 41(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 34991831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of
Akimoto E; Kadoya T; Kajitani K; Emi A; Shigematsu H; Ohara M; Masumoto N; Okada M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28993056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer].
Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between tumor heterogeneity measured on FDG-PET/CT and pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer.
Soussan M; Orlhac F; Boubaya M; Zelek L; Ziol M; Eder V; Buvat I
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94017. PubMed ID: 24722644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating molecular subtypes and clinicopathological features of primary breast cancer.
Arslan E; Çermik TF; Trabulus FDC; Talu ECK; Başaran Ş
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):680-690. PubMed ID: 29893750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of internal mammary lymph node metastasis with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with stage III breast cancer.
Seo MJ; Lee JJ; Kim HO; Chae SY; Park SH; Ryu JS; Ahn SH; Lee JW; Son BH; Gong GY; Moon DH
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Mar; 41(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 24196918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
