These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3580048)

  • 1. Evaluation of the automated leukocyte differential count in emergency department patients.
    Rimarenko S; Castella A; Salzberg MR; Strand CL
    Am J Emerg Med; 1987 May; 5(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 3580048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus IV.
    Cox CJ; Habermann TM; Payne BA; Klee GG; Pierre RV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 84(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 4036859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The routine differential leukocyte count vs automated differential counts.
    Pierre RV
    Blood Cells; 1985; 11(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 4074885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of leucocyte populations with the Coulter S-Plus STKR as a screening tool for haematological abnormalities.
    d'Onofrio G; Salvati AM; Berti P; Cappabianca MP; Marsili G; Quarantelli M; Zini G; Casini C; De Philippis C; Mango G
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1991; 13(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 2060263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.
    Griswold DJ; Champagne VD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Jul; 84(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 4014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation and performance of the Coulter STKS.
    Verheul FE; Spitters JM; Bergmans CH
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Mar; 31(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 8490065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated three-part leukocyte differential counts in the preoperative evaluation of ambulatory surgery patients.
    Kalish RJ; Goldberg G; Roberts K; Schwartz S; Iorio C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1987 Dec; 111(12):1155-7. PubMed ID: 3675152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of differential white blood cell counts using manual technic and the Coulter S-Plus IV.
    Greendyke RM; Kanter DR; DeBoover L; Savage L; VanGelder S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 84(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 4036866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Coulter S-Plus three-part differential in population with a high prevalence of abnormalities.
    Cornbleet J; Kessinger S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Nov; 84(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 4061385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the leukocyte differential flags on an hematologic analyzer. The Cobas Argos 5 Diff.
    Lacombe F; Cazaux N; Briais A; Labroille G; Puntous M; Reiffers J; Belloc F; Boisseau MR; Bernard P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 7572808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of an automated differential leukocyte counting system. I. Instrument description and reproducibility studies.
    Dutcher TF; Benzel JE; Egan JJ; Hart DJ; Christopher EA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1974 Oct; 62(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 4413299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an automatic hematology analyzer in patients with nonhematologic conditions.
    Lam CP; Fan HC; Chiang H; Ho CH
    Adv Ther; 1997; 14(5):234-44. PubMed ID: 10174619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of four leukocyte differential methods with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) reference method.
    Pierre RV; Payne BA; Lee WK; Hyma BA; Melchert LM; Scheidt RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Feb; 87(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 3812351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S+IV LMG: estimation of the leukocyte formula. Comparison with microscopic methods].
    Tarallo P; Henny J; Siest G; Humbert JC
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1986; 44(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 3706832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.
    Miers MK; Fogo AB; Federspiel CF; McAllister NW; Phillips PA; Cousar JB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Jun; 87(6):745-51. PubMed ID: 3591747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Coulter Counter leukocyte differential.
    Richardson-Jones A; Hellman R; Twedt D
    Blood Cells; 1985; 11(2):203-40. PubMed ID: 3834962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory evaluation of differential white blood cell count information from the Coulter S-plus IV and Technicon H-1 in patient populations requiring rapid "turnaround" time.
    Nelson L; Charache S; Wingfield S; Keyser E
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1989 May; 91(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 2718955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
    Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of an automated differential leukocyte counting system. II. Normal cell identification.
    Benzel JE; Egan JJ; Hart DJ; Christopher EA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1974 Oct; 62(4):530-6. PubMed ID: 4413300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of the three-part leukocyte differential count.
    Duncan KL; Gottfried EL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Sep; 88(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 3630973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.