These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35801399)

  • 1. Effect of targeting and generator type on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Motolova M; Kral M
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2022 Dec; 166(4):434-440. PubMed ID: 35801399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter: Efficacy, pain and complications.
    Bianchi G; Marega D; Knez R; Bucci S; Trombetta C
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Sep; 90(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 30362681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter.
    Bhojani N; Mandeville JA; Hameed TA; Soergel TM; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Krambeck AE; Lingeman JE
    J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):875-9. PubMed ID: 25305356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.
    Chang TH; Lin WR; Tsai WK; Chiang PK; Chen M; Tseng JS; Chiu AW
    BMC Urol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):183. PubMed ID: 33172476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric urolithiasis: a single institution experience.
    Stamatiou KN; Heretis I; Takos D; Papadimitriou V; Sofras F
    Int Braz J Urol; 2010; 36(6):724-30; discussion 731. PubMed ID: 21176279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Piezoelectric, electrohydraulic and electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stone].
    Sun X; Chen C; Wang Y; Yu H
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 37(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 11829829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.
    Neisius A; Wöllner J; Thomas C; Roos FC; Brenner W; Hampel C; Preminger GM; Thüroff JW; Gillitzer R
    BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):972-81. PubMed ID: 24118958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Characteristics and efficiency of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children using ultrasound guidance].
    Grabsky AM; Minasyan GM; Khachatryan YA; Martirosyan SA; Toqmajyan MG; Tadevosyan GG; Shadyan GG; Qocharyan AA; Shindyan IM
    Urologiia; 2020 Sep; (4):90-94. PubMed ID: 32897020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Urolithiasis--a change in therapeutic methods extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using a Dornier kidney lithotripter HM3].
    Yamamoto K; Kishimoto T; Sakamoto W; Sugimoto T; Iimori H; Kanasawa T; Wada S; Senju M; Nakatani T; Sugimura K
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Dec; 35(12):2093-8. PubMed ID: 2618909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Treatment of lithiasis in horseshoe kidney with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy].
    Torrecilla Ortíz C; Ponce Campuzano A; Contreras García J; Marco Pérez LM; Colom Feixas S; Vigués Juliá F; Serrallach Milá N
    Actas Urol Esp; 2001 Jan; 25(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 11284368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a comparative study of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic units.
    Matin SF; Yost A; Streem SB
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2053-6. PubMed ID: 11696705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decreased Radiation Exposure and Increased Efficacy in Extracorporeal Lithotripsy Using a New Ultrasound Stone Locking System.
    Abid N; Ravier E; Promeyrat X; Codas R; Fehri HF; Crouzet S; Martin X
    J Endourol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1263-9. PubMed ID: 26133199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lee HY; Yang YH; Lee YL; Shen JT; Jang MY; Shih PM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Juan YS
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 25975631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with a transportable electrohydraulic lithotripter: experience with >300 patients.
    Albala DM; Siddiqui KM; Fulmer B; Alioto J; Frankel J; Monga M
    BJU Int; 2005 Sep; 96(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 16104918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative factors of unenhanced CT for predicting fragmenting efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on pancreatic duct stones.
    Liu R; Su W; Wang J; Gong J; Lu J
    Clin Radiol; 2019 May; 74(5):408.e1-408.e7. PubMed ID: 30808501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Bandi G; Meiners RJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nakada SY
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 19007365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the role of urine chemistry in shock wave lithotripsy outcomes.
    Erdoğan E; Sarıca K
    Urolithiasis; 2024 Oct; 52(1):136. PubMed ID: 39382730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a place for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the endoscopic era?
    Chen X; Chen J; Zhou X; Long Q; He H; Li X
    Urolithiasis; 2022 Jun; 50(3):369-374. PubMed ID: 35122131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of ultrasound monitoring during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched study.
    Isogai M; Hamamoto S; Kawase K; Okada T; Hattori T; Chaya R; Hamakawa T; Sugino T; Taguchi K; Umemoto Y; Okada A; Yasui T
    Int J Urol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 35871263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters.
    Zisman A; Assadi A; Goldin O; Malshy K; Nativ O; Meretyk S; Amiel GE; Mullerad M; Livne PM
    Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1260-1264. PubMed ID: 35172318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.