143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35802190)
1. Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.
Lan Y; Huang X; Fan M; Yu H; Xie Z; Zhou Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6347-6359. PubMed ID: 35802190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 23064974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review.
Costa JA; Mendes JM; Salazar F; Pacheco JJ; Rompante P; Câmara MI
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):455-466. PubMed ID: 37058184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
Razavi T; Palmer RM; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer PJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography, cone beam CT, and dental MRI for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions at zirconia implants - an ex vivo feasibility study.
Miotk N; Schwindling FS; Zidan M; Juerchott A; Rammelsberg P; Hosseini Z; Nittka M; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Hilgenfeld T
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104422. PubMed ID: 36649822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces.
Yen CY; Kuo PJ; Lin CY; Nie-Shiuh Chang N; Hsiao HY; Chin YT; Tsai CC; Lee SY
J Dent Sci; 2019 Jun; 14(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31210886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive peri-implant tissue evaluation with ultrasonography and cone-beam computed tomography: A pilot study.
Siqueira R; Sinjab K; Pan YC; Soki F; Chan HL; Kripfgans O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Jul; 32(7):777-785. PubMed ID: 33866602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: An in vitro study.
Pelekos G; Tse JMN; Ho D; Tonetti MS
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 31536645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of CBCT filters and contrast adjustments on peri-implant buccal bone thickness measurement and blooming expression.
Mello HN; Bonadiman EA; Bruneli GL; Pitol GA; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):315. PubMed ID: 38748313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring peri-implant bone lesions using low-dose cone-beam computed tomography.
Leisner LC; Tasaka A; Trebing CT; Hilgenfeld T; Kosinski MA; Kronsteiner D; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Apr; 66(2):326-332. PubMed ID: 34305085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CBCT vs other imaging modalities to assess peri-implant bone and diagnose complications: a systematic review.
Jacobs R; Vranckx M; Vanderstuyft T; Quirynen M; Salmon B
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11 Suppl 1():77-92. PubMed ID: 30109301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
