These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35803216)

  • 1. The Cupid shuffle: Do enhancers prefer specific promoters?
    Wang HV; Corces VG
    Mol Cell; 2022 Jul; 82(13):2357-2359. PubMed ID: 35803216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compatibility rules of human enhancer and promoter sequences.
    Bergman DT; Jones TR; Liu V; Ray J; Jagoda E; Siraj L; Kang HY; Nasser J; Kane M; Rios A; Nguyen TH; Grossman SR; Fulco CP; Lander ES; Engreitz JM
    Nature; 2022 Jul; 607(7917):176-184. PubMed ID: 35594906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation.
    Zabidi MA; Arnold CD; Schernhuber K; Pagani M; Rath M; Frank O; Stark A
    Nature; 2015 Feb; 518(7540):556-9. PubMed ID: 25517091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two promoters integrate multiple enhancer inputs to drive wild-type knirps expression in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.
    Li L; Waymack R; Gad M; Wunderlich Z
    Genetics; 2021 Dec; 219(4):. PubMed ID: 34849867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Housekeeping and tissue-specific cis-regulatory elements: Recipes for specificity and recipes for activity.
    Russo M; Natoli G; Ghisletti S
    Transcription; 2018; 9(3):177-181. PubMed ID: 28992423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The degree of enhancer or promoter activity is reflected by the levels and directionality of eRNA transcription.
    Mikhaylichenko O; Bondarenko V; Harnett D; Schor IE; Males M; Viales RR; Furlong EEM
    Genes Dev; 2018 Jan; 32(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 29378788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model of active transcription hubs that unifies the roles of active promoters and enhancers.
    Zhu I; Song W; Ovcharenko I; Landsman D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 May; 49(8):4493-4505. PubMed ID: 33872375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synergism between immunoglobulin enhancers and promoters.
    Garcia JV; Bich-Thuy LT; Stafford J; Queen C
    Nature; 1986 Jul 24-30; 322(6077):383-5. PubMed ID: 3016550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancers: holding out for the right promoter.
    Lorberbaum DS; Barolo S
    Curr Biol; 2015 Mar; 25(7):R290-3. PubMed ID: 25829016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of gene expression in mouse preimplantation embryos demonstrates that the primary role of enhancers is to relieve repression of promoters.
    Majumder S; Miranda M; DePamphilis ML
    EMBO J; 1993 Mar; 12(3):1131-40. PubMed ID: 8458327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Distant interactions between enhancers and promoters in Drosophila melanogaster are mediated by transgene-flanking Su(Hw) insulators].
    Davydova AI; Erokhin MM; Georgiev PG; Chetverina DA
    Genetika; 2011 Aug; 47(8):1037-43. PubMed ID: 21954612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pervasive and CpG-dependent promoter-like characteristics of transcribed enhancers.
    Steinhaus R; Gonzalez T; Seelow D; Robinson PN
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jun; 48(10):5306-5317. PubMed ID: 32338759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional genome architectural CCCTC-binding factor makes choice in duplicated enhancers at Pcdhα locus.
    Wu Y; Jia Z; Ge X; Wu Q
    Sci China Life Sci; 2020 Jun; 63(6):835-844. PubMed ID: 32249388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcription start site analysis reveals widespread divergent transcription in D. melanogaster and core promoter-encoded enhancer activities.
    Rennie S; Dalby M; Lloret-Llinares M; Bakoulis S; Dalager Vaagensø C; Heick Jensen T; Andersson R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jun; 46(11):5455-5469. PubMed ID: 29659982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulatory Enhancer-Core-Promoter Communication via Transcription Factors and Cofactors.
    Zabidi MA; Stark A
    Trends Genet; 2016 Dec; 32(12):801-814. PubMed ID: 27816209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In trans promoter activation by enhancers in transient transfection.
    Smirnov NA; Akopov SB; Didych DA; Nikolaev LG
    Gene; 2017 Mar; 603():15-20. PubMed ID: 27956170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Enhancer Function and Transcription.
    Field A; Adelman K
    Annu Rev Biochem; 2020 Jun; 89():213-234. PubMed ID: 32197056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compatibility between enhancers and promoters determines the transcriptional specificity of gooseberry and gooseberry neuro in the Drosophila embryo.
    Li X; Noll M
    EMBO J; 1994 Jan; 13(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 8313885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome.
    Martinez-Ara M; Comoglio F; van Arensbergen J; van Steensel B
    Mol Cell; 2022 Jul; 82(13):2519-2531.e6. PubMed ID: 35594855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Widespread Enhancer Activity from Core Promoters.
    Medina-Rivera A; Santiago-Algarra D; Puthier D; Spicuglia S
    Trends Biochem Sci; 2018 Jun; 43(6):452-468. PubMed ID: 29673772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.