These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35803353)

  • 21. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
    Sharma T
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an awareness campaign for colorectal cancer: a mathematical modeling study.
    Whyte S; Harnan S
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Jun; 25(6):647-58. PubMed ID: 24682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-effectiveness of alternative colonoscopy surveillance strategies to mitigate metachronous colorectal cancer incidence.
    Erenay FS; Alagoz O; Banerjee R; Said A; Cima RR
    Cancer; 2016 Aug; 122(16):2560-70. PubMed ID: 27248907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.
    Worthington J; Lew JB; Feletto E; Holden CA; Worthley DL; Miller C; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0227899. PubMed ID: 32012174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modelling the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on bowel cancer screening outcomes in England: A decision analysis to prepare for future screening disruption.
    Mandrik O; Chilcott J; Thomas C
    Prev Med; 2022 Jul; 160():107076. PubMed ID: 35526674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A systematic review.
    Gheysariyeha F; Rahimi F; Tabesh E; Hemami MR; Adibi P; Rezayatmand R
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2022 Nov; 31(6):e13673. PubMed ID: 35974390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions with Their Effects on Health Disparity Being Considered.
    Lee KS; Park EC
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 48(3):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26727714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost-Effectiveness of Outreach Strategies for Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Medicaid Population.
    Karlitz JJ; Fendrick AM; Bhatt J; Coronado GD; Jeyakumar S; Smith NJ; Plescia M; Brooks D; Limburg P; Lieberman D
    Popul Health Manag; 2022 Jun; 25(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 34958279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term benefits for lower socioeconomic groups by improving bowel screening participation in South Australia: A modelling study.
    Lal A; Gao L; Tan E; McCaffrey N; Roder D; Buckley E
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279177. PubMed ID: 36542644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Bosch LJW; Melotte V; Carvalho B; van Engeland M; Meijer GA; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):504-512.e11. PubMed ID: 28733262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Options for screening for colorectal cancer in the Royal Air Force: a cost-effectiveness evaluation.
    Daniels K; McKee M
    J R Army Med Corps; 1995 Oct; 141(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 8568748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening based on risk for colorectal cancer is the most cost-effective approach.
    Dan YY; Chuah BY; Koh DC; Yeoh KG
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):266-71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22100624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: A systematic literature review.
    Mendivil J; Appierto M; Aceituno S; Comas M; Rué M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227251. PubMed ID: 31891647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative evaluation of novel screening strategies for colorectal cancer screening in China (TARGET-C): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Chen H; Li N; Shi J; Ren J; Liu C; Zhang Y; Jiang Z; Zhang Z; Dai M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e025935. PubMed ID: 31005927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhong GC; Sun WP; Wan L; Hu JJ; Hao FB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Mar; 91(3):684-697.e15. PubMed ID: 31790657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.
    Dinh TA; Alperin P; Walter LC; Smith R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 22237663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost-effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy in Iranian High Risk Population.
    Javadinasab H; Daroudi R; Salimzadeh H; Delavari A; Vezvaie P; Malekzadeh R
    Arch Iran Med; 2017 Sep; 20(9):564-571. PubMed ID: 29048918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The case for philanthropic investment to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: A novel paradigm to address a public health challenge.
    Carmeli A; Dranikoff L; Kundu A; Ladabaum U
    Cancer Med; 2020 Feb; 9(3):1220-1229. PubMed ID: 31808317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.