These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35803486)

  • 1. Choices about whether to wait: Changes in delay discounting without changes in time perception.
    Witt KM; Macaskill AC
    Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104696. PubMed ID: 35803486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced access to reinforcement drives delay discounting during experienced delays.
    Macaskill AC; Thompson-Davies K; Hunt MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):416-428. PubMed ID: 37694442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.
    Xu P; González-Vallejo C; Vincent BT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Dec; 149(12):2289-2313. PubMed ID: 32391703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making Time for Nature: Visual Exposure to Natural Environments Lengthens Subjective Time Perception and Reduces Impulsivity.
    Berry MS; Repke MA; Nickerson NP; Conway LG; Odum AL; Jordan KE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141030. PubMed ID: 26558610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Waiting and working for rewards: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder is associated with steeper delay discounting linked to amygdala activation, but not with steeper effort discounting.
    Mies GW; Ma I; de Water E; Buitelaar JK; Scheres A
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():164-173. PubMed ID: 30005368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A delay discounting task produces a greater likelihood of waiting than a deferred gratification task.
    Young ME; McCoy AW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):180-95. PubMed ID: 25515382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal discounting when outcomes are experienced in the moment: Validation of a novel paradigm and comparison with a classic hypothetical intertemporal choice task.
    Patt VM; Hunsberger R; Jones DA; Keane MM; Verfaellie M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251480. PubMed ID: 33989315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential delay and probability discounting tasks in mice reveal anchoring effects partially attributable to decision noise.
    Rojas GR; Curry-Pochy LS; Chen CS; Heller AT; Grissom NM
    Behav Brain Res; 2022 Aug; 431():113951. PubMed ID: 35661751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Hippocampus Contributes to Temporal Discounting When Delays and Rewards Are Experienced in the Moment.
    Patt VM; Hunsberger R; Jones DA; Verfaellie M
    J Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 43(31):5710-5722. PubMed ID: 37463727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human choices between variable and fixed rewards in hypothetical variable-delay and double-reward discounting procedures.
    McKerchar TL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jul; 106(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 27353633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased Delay Discounting on a Novel Real-Time Task among Girls, but not Boys, with ADHD.
    Rosch KS; Mostofsky SH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Jan; 22(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 26549118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gamification and motivation: Impact on delay discounting performance.
    Harvey S; Jensen G; Anderson KG
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0299511. PubMed ID: 38626247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The costs of delay: waiting versus postponing in intertemporal choice.
    Paglieri F
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):362-77. PubMed ID: 23413105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of delay sequence in a delay discounting task.
    Macías-Navarrete JR; Dos Santos CV
    Behav Processes; 2024 Jun; 219():105046. PubMed ID: 38762054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social discounting of pain.
    Story GW; Kurth-Nelson Z; Crockett M; Vlaev I; Darzi A; Dolan RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Nov; 114(3):308-325. PubMed ID: 33026113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rats value time differently on equivalent foraging and delay-discounting tasks.
    Carter EC; Redish AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Sep; 145(9):1093-101. PubMed ID: 27359127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotional content impacts how executive function ability relates to willingness to wait and to work for reward.
    Damme KSF; Kelley NJ; Quinn ME; Glazer JE; Chat IK; Young KS; Nusslock R; Zinbarg R; Bookheimer S; Craske MG
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 19(3):637-652. PubMed ID: 30937705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Childhood ADHD and Delayed Reinforcement: A Direct Comparison of Performance on Hypothetical and Real-Time Delay Tasks.
    Yu X; Sonuga-Barke E
    J Atten Disord; 2020 Mar; 24(5):810-818. PubMed ID: 27469395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A behavioral economic analysis of texting while driving: Delay discounting processes.
    Hayashi Y; Miller K; Foreman AM; Wirth O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():132-140. PubMed ID: 27614547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing.
    Marshall AT; Smith AP; Kirkpatrick K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 24965705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.