These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35804087)

  • 1. Analysing the effect of gender on the human-machine interaction in level 3 automated vehicles.
    Li S; Blythe P; Zhang Y; Edwards S; Guo W; Ji Y; Goodman P; Hill G; Namdeo A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11645. PubMed ID: 35804087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality.
    Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Marberger C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):596-613. PubMed ID: 30689440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
    Wandtner B; Schömig N; Schmidt G
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29617161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian Regression Analysis of the Effects of Alert Presence and Scenario Criticality on Automated Vehicle Takeover Performance.
    Alambeigi H; McDonald AD
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):288-305. PubMed ID: 33908795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
    Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.
    McDonald AD; Alambeigi H; Engström J; Markkula G; Vogelpohl T; Dunne J; Yuma N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):642-688. PubMed ID: 30830804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Takeover requests for automated driving: The effects of signal direction, lead time, and modality on takeover performance.
    Huang G; Pitts BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106534. PubMed ID: 34922107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Olfactory Facilitation of Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
    Tang Q; Guo G; Zhang Z; Zhang B; Wu Y
    Hum Factors; 2021 Jun; 63(4):553-564. PubMed ID: 31999480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up.
    Wörle J; Metz B; Othersen I; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105617. PubMed ID: 32540623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.
    Ma S; Zhang W; Yang Z; Kang C; Wu C; Chai C; Shi J; Li H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(7):482-487. PubMed ID: 32822218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1583-1599. PubMed ID: 36473708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing car-following behaviors of human drivers when following automated vehicles using the real-world dataset.
    Wen X; Cui Z; Jian S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106689. PubMed ID: 35569279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of duration of monitoring before takeover request on takeover time with insights into eye tracking data.
    Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107018. PubMed ID: 36924623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving.
    Ou YK; Huang WX; Fang CW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106425. PubMed ID: 34601181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.