165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35804912)
1. Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study.
Ten Eikelder MLG; Hinten F; Smits A; Van der Aa MA; Bekkers RLM; IntHout J; Wenzel HHB; Zusterzeel PLM
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35804912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion for stage IA1 and IA2 cervical cancer.
Margolis B; Cagle-Colon K; Chen L; Tergas AI; Boyd L; Wright JD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jun; 30(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 32179697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China.
Qian Q; Yang J; Cao D; You Y; Chen J; Shen K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 25142622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage.
Balaya V; Guani B; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F; On Behalf Of The Senticol Group
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33260758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Mohamud A; Høgdall C; Schnack T
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 35346512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Assessment of Cervical Cancer Patients by Clinical Staging and Surgical-Pathological Factor: A Support Vector Machine-Based Approach.
Xie L; Chu R; Wang K; Zhang X; Li J; Zhao Z; Yao S; Wang Z; Dong T; Yang X; Su X; Qiao X; Song K; Kong B
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1353. PubMed ID: 32850433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer.
Pol FJ; Zusterzeel PL; van Ham MA; Kuijpers DA; Bulten J; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 26126782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative platelet count improves the prognostic prediction of the FIGO staging system for operable cervical cancer patients.
Zheng RR; Huang XX; Jin C; Zhuang XX; Ye LC; Zheng FY; Lin F
Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Oct; 473():198-203. PubMed ID: 27836106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective analysis of the incidence and predictive factors of parametrial involvement in FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Yang Q; Zhou Q; He X; Cai J; Sun S; Huang B; Wang Z
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 50(8):102145. PubMed ID: 33848645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel prognostic nomogram utilizing the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer: A large multicenter study.
Tang X; Guo C; Liu S; Guo J; Hua K; Qiu J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 155(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 33587753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stage Migration in Cervical Cancer Using the FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Retrospective Survival Analysis Using a Single-Institution Patient Cohort.
Vengaloor Thomas T; Reddy KK; Gandhi S; Nittala MR; Abraham A; Robinson W; Ridgway M; Packianathan S; Vijayakumar S
Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19289. PubMed ID: 34877225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer.
Weyl A; Illac C; Lusque A; Leray H; Vaysse C; Martinez A; Chantalat E; Motton S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Oct; 30(10):1493-1499. PubMed ID: 32565486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy.
Ayhan A; Al RA; Baykal C; Demirtas E; Ayhan A; Yüce K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 15086728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of lymph vascular space invasion on prognosis of patients with early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Yan M; Zhang YN; He JH; Sun JR; Sun XM
Chin J Cancer; 2010 Apr; 29(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 20346220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
