These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35805839)

  • 1. Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights in Watershed Using a Hybrid FBWM-Grey-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of the Jiangsu Section of the Sunan Canal, China.
    Zhang X; Shen J; Sun F; Wang S; Zhang S; Chen J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of the Allocation of Regional Flood Drainage Rights in Watershed Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of the Jiangsu Section of the Huaihe River, China.
    Zhang K; Shen J; Han H; Zhang J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32668694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial allocation of flood drainage rights based on a PSR model and entropy-based matter-element theory in the Sunan Canal, China.
    Sun F; Lai X; Shen J; Nie L; Gao X
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233570. PubMed ID: 32479523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights Based on the PSR Model and Pythagoras Fuzzy TOPSIS Method.
    Zhang D; Shen J; Liu P; Sun F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Environmental Gini Coefficient for Allocation of Regional Flood Drainage Rights.
    Zhang D; Shen J; Liu P; Zhang Q; Sun F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32244959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urban flood resilience assessment using RAGA-PP and KL-TOPSIS model based on PSR framework: A case study of Jiangsu province, China.
    Ji J; Chen J
    Water Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 86(12):3264-3280. PubMed ID: 36579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of machine learning algorithms and new hybrid multi-criteria analysis for flood hazard and mapping.
    Solaimani K; Darvishi S; Shokrian F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 May; 31(22):32950-32971. PubMed ID: 38671269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework to support decision making in the selection of sustainable drainage system design alternatives.
    Wang M; Sweetapple C; Fu G; Farmani R; Butler D
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Oct; 201():145-152. PubMed ID: 28654802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prioritization of control measures in leakage scenario using Hendershot theory and FBWM-TOPSIS.
    Laal F; Khoshakhlagh A; Moradi Hanifi S; Pouyakian M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0298948. PubMed ID: 38578797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.
    Pathan AI; Girish Agnihotri P; Said S; Patel D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(7):509. PubMed ID: 35713716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hybrid novel framework for flood disaster risk control in developing countries based on smart prediction systems and prioritized scenarios.
    Akbarian H; Gheibi M; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M; Rahmani M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jun; 312():114939. PubMed ID: 35338986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regional Water Resources Security Evaluation Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS Method.
    Tu Y; Chen K; Wang H; Li Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32664379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of TOPSIS method for flood susceptibility mapping using Excel and GIS.
    Mitra R; Das J; Kamruzzaman M
    MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102263. PubMed ID: 37416489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis.
    Bu FK; He J; Li HR; Fu Q
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Aug; 17(5):5584-5603. PubMed ID: 33120567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of flood probability and prioritization of sub-watersheds: A comparison of game theory to machine learning.
    Avand M; Khiavi AN; Khazaei M; Tiefenbacher JP
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113040. PubMed ID: 34147991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urban Sustainability Evaluation under the Modified TOPSIS Based on Grey Relational Analysis.
    Tang J; Zhu HL; Liu Z; Jia F; Zheng XX
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 30658429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple flood vulnerability assessment approach based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and coordinated development degree model.
    Yang W; Xu K; Lian J; Bin L; Ma C
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():440-450. PubMed ID: 29505999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emergency material location-allocation planning using a risk-based integration methodology for river chemical spills.
    Liu J; Jiang D; Guo L; Nan J; Cao W; Wang P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(15):17949-17962. PubMed ID: 32166691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated flood hazard assessment based on spatial ordered weighted averaging method considering spatial heterogeneity of risk preference.
    Xiao Y; Yi S; Tang Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 599-600():1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28511348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coordinated development of economic growth and ecological efficiency in Jiangsu, China.
    Wang S; Hua G; Yang L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(29):36664-36676. PubMed ID: 32564315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.