These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 358061)

  • 21. [Objective determination of auditory threshold in the child].
    Swoboda-Brunner E; Swoboda H; Neuwirth-Riedl K; Türk R
    HNO; 1989 Mar; 37(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 2708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The choice of stimulus in the auditory brainstem response test for neurological and audiological examinations.
    Suzuki J; Yamane H
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():731-6. PubMed ID: 6953910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contingent negative variations and differential hearing thresholds.
    Brix R
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976 Nov; 97 Suppl():602-12. PubMed ID: 1019445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Evoked potentials of the brain stem in normal and pathologic conditions: experience with 692 adult subjects].
    Burdo S
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1989; 9 Suppl 24():1-36. PubMed ID: 2686347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pitfalls in auditory brain stem response audiometry.
    Weber BA
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 6618036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Results of using cortical electroencephaloaudiometry in clinical practice].
    Pavlov V; Shishkov L
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1977; (4):75-8. PubMed ID: 888289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical experience with brain stem audiometry performed under general anesthesia.
    Sanders RA; Duncan PG; McCullough DW
    J Otolaryngol; 1979 Feb; 8(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 458910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of change of stimulus frequency on the prediction of audiograms.
    Jerger J; Hayes D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():729-30. PubMed ID: 6953909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Quantitative results of the brainstem audiometry in middle ear, cochlear, and retrocochlear hearing damage (author's transl)].
    Gerull G; Giesen M; Mrowinski D
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jan; 57(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 625180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical considerations in the interpretation of auditory brainstem response audiometry.
    Jacobson JT; Novotny GM; Elliott S
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 9(6):493-504. PubMed ID: 7206036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Characteristics of the amplitude-time parameters of the auditory evoked potentials in different forms of hearing loss].
    Ryndina AM; Murav'eva KA; Antipova NP
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1982; (3):21-4. PubMed ID: 7048696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An evaluation of cortical audiometry.
    Davies DG; Roberts J
    Proc R Soc Med; 1972 Apr; 65(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 5024520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Brain map. New possibilities in diagnosis of central auditory disorders?
    Borg E; Spens KE; Tonnquist I; Rosén S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1987; 103(5-6):612. PubMed ID: 3618188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Brain stem potentials and the auditory threshold].
    Novák M; Janisch R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1982 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7067008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Brain stem evoked response audiometry via air- and bone-conducted stimulation (author's transl)].
    Hofmann G; Flach M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 May; 60(5):264-7. PubMed ID: 7231015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [EEG- and COR-audiometry in childhood within the frame of an age related mass screening].
    Weymar P; Mahler KF; Schmieschek J; Stürzebecher J
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1974 Aug; 68(16):850-4. PubMed ID: 4440004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Limitation of auditory evoked potentials for the diagnosis of deafness in children].
    Hélias J
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1985; 106(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 3834555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Influence of the stimulation interval on the pattern of the evoked potential in E.R.A (author's transl)].
    Schunicht R; Esser G
    HNO; 1973 Dec; 21(12):373-6. PubMed ID: 4786011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Threshold extrapolation for N1-latencies in auditory evoked responses.
    Arlinger S
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1975; 96(3-4):147-52. PubMed ID: 1215704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hearing impairment and audiograms.
    Terkildsen K
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980; (Suppl 10):27-31. PubMed ID: 6934606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.