BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35808206)

  • 1. Inertia-Acoustophoresis Hybrid Microfluidic Device for Rapid and Efficient Cell Separation.
    Kim U; Oh B; Ahn J; Lee S; Cho Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and experimental investigation of a novel spiral microfluidic chip to separate wide size range of micro-particles aimed at cell separation.
    Tabatabaei SA; Zabetian Targhi M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Nov; 235(11):1315-1328. PubMed ID: 34218740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Separation of sub-micron particles from micron particles using acoustic fluid relocation combined with acoustophoresis.
    Gautam GP; Gurung R; Fencl FA; Piyasena ME
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2018 Oct; 410(25):6561-6571. PubMed ID: 30046870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elastic-inertial separation of microparticle in a gradually contracted microchannel.
    Tian ZZ; Gan CS; Fan LL; Wang JC; Zhao L
    Electrophoresis; 2022 Nov; 43(21-22):2217-2226. PubMed ID: 36084168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A microfluidic chip with a serpentine channel enabling high-throughput cell separation using surface acoustic waves.
    Ning S; Liu S; Xiao Y; Zhang G; Cui W; Reed M
    Lab Chip; 2021 Nov; 21(23):4608-4617. PubMed ID: 34763349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High performance isolation of circulating tumor cells by acoustofluidic chip coupled with ultrasonic concentrated energy transducer.
    Qiu H; Wang H; Yang X; Huo F
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2023 Feb; 222():113138. PubMed ID: 36638753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-throughput cell focusing and separation via acoustofluidic tweezers.
    Wu M; Chen K; Yang S; Wang Z; Huang PH; Mai J; Li ZY; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2018 Sep; 18(19):3003-3010. PubMed ID: 30131991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement of size-based particle separation throughput in slanted spiral microchannel by modifying outlet geometry.
    Mihandoust A; Maleki-Jirsaraei N; Rouhani S; Safi S; Alizadeh M
    Electrophoresis; 2020 Mar; 41(5-6):353-359. PubMed ID: 32012295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Size-tuneable isolation of cancer cells using stretchable inertial microfluidics.
    Fallahi H; Yadav S; Phan HP; Ta H; Zhang J; Nguyen NT
    Lab Chip; 2021 May; 21(10):2008-2018. PubMed ID: 34008666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic focusing with engineered node locations for high-performance microfluidic particle separation.
    Fong EJ; Johnston AC; Notton T; Jung SY; Rose KA; Weinberger LS; Shusteff M
    Analyst; 2014 Mar; 139(5):1192-200. PubMed ID: 24448925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microfluidic acoustic sawtooth metasurfaces for patterning and separation using traveling surface acoustic waves.
    Xu M; Lee PVS; Collins DJ
    Lab Chip; 2021 Dec; 22(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 34860222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective cell trapping using PDMS microspheres in an acoustofluidic chip.
    Yin D; Xu G; Wang M; Shen M; Xu T; Zhu X; Shi X
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2017 Sep; 157():347-354. PubMed ID: 28622655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid prototyping and parametric optimization of plastic acoustofluidic devices for blood-bacteria separation.
    Silva R; Dow P; Dubay R; Lissandrello C; Holder J; Densmore D; Fiering J
    Biomed Microdevices; 2017 Sep; 19(3):70. PubMed ID: 28779375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microfluidic Acoustophoresis for Flowthrough Separation of Gram-Negative Bacteria using Aptamer Affinity Beads.
    Choi HJ; Kim BW; Lee S; Jeong OC
    J Vis Exp; 2022 Oct; (188):. PubMed ID: 36314795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization Analysis of Particle Separation Parameters for a Standing Surface Acoustic Wave Acoustofluidic Chip.
    Han J; Hu H; Lei Y; Huang Q; Fu C; Gai C; Ning J
    ACS Omega; 2023 Jan; 8(1):311-323. PubMed ID: 36643460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple and inexpensive micromachined aluminum microfluidic devices for acoustic focusing of particles and cells.
    Gautam GP; Burger T; Wilcox A; Cumbo MJ; Graves SW; Piyasena ME
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2018 May; 410(14):3385-3394. PubMed ID: 29651523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separation of 300 and 100 nm Particles in Fabry-Perot Acoustofluidic Resonators.
    Sehgal P; Kirby BJ
    Anal Chem; 2017 Nov; 89(22):12192-12200. PubMed ID: 29039191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inertial microfluidics in parallel channels for high-throughput applications.
    Hansson J; Karlsson JM; Haraldsson T; Brismar H; van der Wijngaart W; Russom A
    Lab Chip; 2012 Nov; 12(22):4644-50. PubMed ID: 22930164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustophoresis in wet-etched glass chips.
    Evander M; Lenshof A; Laurell T; Nilsson J
    Anal Chem; 2008 Jul; 80(13):5178-85. PubMed ID: 18489126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustophoretic sorting of viable mammalian cells in a microfluidic device.
    Yang AH; Soh HT
    Anal Chem; 2012 Dec; 84(24):10756-62. PubMed ID: 23157478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.