These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35810512)

  • 1. Bottom-up processes dominate early word recognition in toddlers.
    Chow J; Angulo-Chavira AQ; Spangenberg M; Hentrup L; Plunkett K
    Cognition; 2022 Nov; 228():105214. PubMed ID: 35810512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Neural Network Model of Lexical-Semantic Competition During Spoken Word Recognition.
    Duta M; Plunkett K
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():700281. PubMed ID: 34602993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.
    Chen Q; Mirman D
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 39(3):538-58. PubMed ID: 25155249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociating stimulus-driven semantic and phonological effect during reading and naming.
    Mechelli A; Josephs O; Lambon Ralph MA; McClelland JL; Price CJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Mar; 28(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 16767767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Does a Cue Do? Comparing Phonological and Semantic Cues for Picture Naming in Aphasia.
    Meteyard L; Bose A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):658-674. PubMed ID: 29486495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural evidence for phonologically based language production deficits in older adults: An fMRI investigation of age-related differences in picture-word interference.
    Rizio AA; Moyer KJ; Diaz MT
    Brain Behav; 2017 Apr; 7(4):e00660. PubMed ID: 28413708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of phonological and semantic deficits on facilitative and inhibitory consequences of item repetition in spoken word comprehension.
    Mirman D; Britt AE; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1848-56. PubMed ID: 23770302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top-down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 Nov; 27(11):864-73. PubMed ID: 16547922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of the visual-world paradigm.
    Shen W; Qu Q; Li X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26993126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production.
    van Turennout M; Hagoort P; Brown CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jul; 23(4):787-806. PubMed ID: 9445890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials.
    Zhu X; Damian MF; Zhang Q
    Brain Lang; 2015 May; 144():16-25. PubMed ID: 25880902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological Priming in Children with Hearing Loss: Effect of Speech Mode, Fidelity, and Lexical Status.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Damian MF; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):623-633. PubMed ID: 27438867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.
    Yee E; Sedivy JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16478336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic, Phonological, and Semantic Dynamics During Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Versus Hearing Adults.
    Peleg O; Ben-Hur G; Segal O
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2334-2344. PubMed ID: 32603647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Literacy effects on language and vision: emergent effects from an amodal shared resource (ASR) computational model.
    Smith AC; Monaghan P; Huettig F
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():28-54. PubMed ID: 25171049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting phonology in language comprehension: Evidence from the visual world eye-tracking task in Mandarin Chinese.
    Li X; Li X; Qu Q
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):531-547. PubMed ID: 35482676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming.
    Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H; Gorges F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):356-70. PubMed ID: 19557668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Time Course of Language Production as Revealed by Pattern Classification of MEG Sensor Data.
    Carota F; Schoffelen JM; Oostenveld R; Indefrey P
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jul; 42(29):5745-5754. PubMed ID: 35680410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts.
    Diaz MT; Swaab TY
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():85-100. PubMed ID: 16952338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early Parallel Activation of Semantics and Phonology in Picture Naming: Evidence from a Multiple Linear Regression MEG Study.
    Miozzo M; Pulvermüller F; Hauk O
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Oct; 25(10):3343-55. PubMed ID: 25005037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.