These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35810675)

  • 1. Evaluating the cutoff score of the advanced practice nurse certification examination in Korea.
    Kang Y
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2022 Aug; 63():103407. PubMed ID: 35810675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of results between modified-Angoff and bookmark methods for estimating cut score of the Korean medical licensing examination.
    Yim M
    Korean J Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 30(4):347-357. PubMed ID: 30522263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests.
    Yousefi Afrashteh M
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 33388043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenging the arbitrary cutoff score of 60%: Standard setting evidence from preclinical Operative Dentistry course.
    Yousef MK; Alshawwa L; Tekian A; Park YS
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S75-S79. PubMed ID: 28120635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korea Radiological technologist Licensing Examination : Angoff, Ebel, Bookmark, and Hofstee.
    Park J; Ahn DS; Yim MK; Lee J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():32. PubMed ID: 30586956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Possibility of using the yes/no Angoff method as a substitute for the percent Angoff method for estimating the cutoff score of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination: a simulation study.
    Park J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():23. PubMed ID: 36045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced practice issues: results of the ONS Advanced Practice Nursing survey.
    Lynch MP; Cope DG; Murphy-Ende K
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001; 28(10):1521-30. PubMed ID: 11759300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the Angoff method to set a standard on mock exams for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Yim MK; Shin S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():14. PubMed ID: 32316708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of passing scores on certification examinations: an unresolved issue.
    Karni KR; Lofsness KG
    J Allied Health; 1985 Nov; 14(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 3880065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) certification: validation and predictors of success.
    Robinson TN; Olasky J; Young P; Feldman LS; Fuchshuber PR; Jones SB; Madani A; Brunt M; Mikami D; Jackson GP; Mischna J; Schwaitzberg S; Jones DB
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):916-24. PubMed ID: 26275533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of different standard-setting methods for professional qualifying dental examination.
    Abd-Rahman ANA; Baharuddin IH; Abu-Hassan MI; Davies SJ
    J Dent Educ; 2021 Jul; 85(7):1210-1216. PubMed ID: 33792052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced practice nurses in emergency care settings: A demographic profile.
    Cole FL; Kuensting LL; Maclean S; Abel C; Mickanin J; Brueske P; Wilson ME; Rehwaldt M
    J Emerg Nurs; 2002 Oct; 28(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 12386622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scoring and setting pass/fail standards for an essay certification examination in nurse-midwifery.
    Fullerton JT; Greener DL; Gross LJ
    Midwifery; 1992 Mar; 8(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 1598091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.
    Wilson R; Godfrey CM; Sears K; Medves J; Ross-White A; Lambert N
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):146-55. PubMed ID: 26571290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study.
    Kim DH; Kang YJ; Park HK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():33. PubMed ID: 36503200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and outcomes of the multiple-choice format national certification examination in nurse-midwifery and midwifery.
    Fullerton JT; Parker KW; Severino R
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1997; 42(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 9277065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advanced practice nursing certification: where do we go from here?
    Hodnicki DR
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1998; 4(3):34-43. PubMed ID: 9874961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applying the Bookmark method to medical education: standard setting for an aseptic technique station.
    Lypson ML; Downing SM; Gruppen LD; Yudkowsky R
    Med Teach; 2013 Jul; 35(7):581-5. PubMed ID: 23597240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standard Setting for Clinical Performance of Basic Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography: Moving beyond the Written Test.
    Bick JS; Wanderer JP; Myler CS; Shaw AD; McEvoy MD
    Anesthesiology; 2017 Apr; 126(4):718-728. PubMed ID: 28169844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.