These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35811245)

  • 1. Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.
    Li Z; Li G; Chen L; Ding D; Chen Y; Zhang J; Xu L; Kubo T; Zhang S; Wang Y; Zhou X; Tu S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022; 16(6):509-516. PubMed ID: 35811245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law.
    Tu S; Ding D; Chang Y; Li C; Wijns W; Xu B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 97 Suppl 2():1040-1047. PubMed ID: 33660921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Complex Coronary Lesions.
    Wu X; Wang K; Li G; Wu J; Jiang J; Gao F; Zhu L; Xu Q; Wang X; Xu M; Chen H; Ma L; Han X; Luo N; Tu S; Wang J; Hu X
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Mar; 17(3):e016046. PubMed ID: 38502735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis.
    Xu B; Tu S; Qiao S; Qu X; Chen Y; Yang J; Guo L; Sun Z; Li Z; Tian F; Fang W; Chen J; Li W; Guan C; Holm NR; Wijns W; Hu S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(25):3077-3087. PubMed ID: 29101020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II).
    Westra J; Tu S; Winther S; Nissen L; Vestergaard MB; Andersen BK; Holck EN; Fox Maule C; Johansen JK; Andreasen LN; Simonsen JK; Zhang Y; Kristensen SD; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Terkelsen CJ; Krusell LR; Jakobsen L; Reiber JHC; Lassen JF; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e007107. PubMed ID: 29555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Angiography-derived functional assessment of left main coronary stenoses.
    Yuasa S; Lauri FM; Mejia-Renteria H; Liontou C; Lee HJ; Tanigaki T; Nakayama M; Warisawa T; Uchiyama T; Matsuo H; Davies JE; Sato T; Escaned J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 May; 101(6):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 36934387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and correlation of quantitative flow ratio with fractional flow reserve for assessment of intermediate coronary lesions.
    Kasinadhuni G; Batta A; Gawalkar AA; Budakoty S; Gupta A; Vijayvergiya R
    Acta Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 78(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 35382706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of the angiography-based quantitative flow ratio in intermediate left main coronary artery lesions and comparison with visual estimation.
    Lopez-Palop R; Carrillo P; Leithold G; Lozano I; Nieto A; Frutos A; Garcia J; Freites A; Lacunza J; Duran JM; Hurtado J; Gimeno JR; Valdesuso R; Pinar E; Pascual D
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jul; 383():8-14. PubMed ID: 37085119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary Artery Stenosis Evaluation by Angiography-Derived FFR: Validation by Positron Emission Tomography and Invasive Thermodilution.
    Westra J; Rasmussen LD; Eftekhari A; Winther S; Karim SR; Johansen JK; Hammid O; Søndergaard HM; Ejlersen JA; Gormsen LC; Mogensen LJH; Bøttcher M; Holm NR; Christiansen EH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Oct; 16(10):1321-1331. PubMed ID: 37052562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal diagnostic approach for using CT-derived quantitative flow ratio in patients with stenosis on coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Dahl JN; Rasmussen LD; Ding D; Tu S; Westra J; Wijns W; Christiansen EH; Eftekhari A; Li G; Winther S; Bøttcher M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2024; 18(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 38242777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based versus angiography-based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions.
    Huang J; Emori H; Ding D; Kubo T; Yu W; Huang P; Zhang S; Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Akasaka T; Wijns W; Tu S
    EuroIntervention; 2020 Sep; 16(7):568-576. PubMed ID: 31951207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
    Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.
    Westra J; Andersen BK; Campo G; Matsuo H; Koltowski L; Eftekhari A; Liu T; Di Serafino L; Di Girolamo D; Escaned J; Nef H; Naber C; Barbierato M; Tu S; Neghabat O; Madsen M; Tebaldi M; Tanigaki T; Kochman J; Somi S; Esposito G; Mercone G; Mejia-Renteria H; Ronco F; Bøtker HE; Wijns W; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jul; 7(14):. PubMed ID: 29980523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of ultrasonic flow ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis.
    Yang C; Sui YG; Shen JY; Guan CD; Yu W; Tu SX; Wu YJ; Qian J
    Int J Cardiol; 2024 Apr; 400():131765. PubMed ID: 38211669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Performance of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Australian Patients Referred for Invasive Coronary Angiography.
    Chua A; Ihdayhid AR; Linde JJ; Sørgaard M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS
    Heart Lung Circ; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 35501246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study.
    Kołtowski Ł; Zaleska M; Maksym J; Tomaniak M; Soliński M; Puchta D; Holm NR; Opolski G; Kochman J
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):858-867. PubMed ID: 30128817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis.
    Ties D; van Dijk R; Pundziute G; Lipsic E; Vonck TE; van den Heuvel AFM; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M; van der Harst P
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 271():36-41. PubMed ID: 30131233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.
    Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve versus angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for evaluating left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Sui Y; Yang M; Xu Y; Wu N; Qian J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 May; 99 Suppl 1():1403-1409. PubMed ID: 35129284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.