These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35811382)

  • 1. Effects of temperature on mating behaviour and mating success: A meta-analysis.
    Pilakouta N; Baillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Aug; 91(8):1642-1650. PubMed ID: 35811382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis shows the evidence for context-dependent mating behaviour is inconsistent or weak across animals.
    Dougherty LR
    Ecol Lett; 2021 Apr; 24(4):862-875. PubMed ID: 33471386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Within-generation and transgenerational plasticity of mate choice in oceanic stickleback under climate change.
    Fuxjäger L; Wanzenböck S; Ringler E; Wegner KM; Ahnelt H; Shama LNS
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180183. PubMed ID: 30966960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluctuating Dynamics of Mate Availability Promote the Evolution of Flexible Choosiness in Both Sexes.
    Chevalier L; Labonne J; Galipaud M; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX
    Am Nat; 2020 Dec; 196(6):730-742. PubMed ID: 33211564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.
    Etienne L; Rousset F; Godelle B; Courtiol A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140190. PubMed ID: 24789896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moderately elevated glucocorticoids increase mate choosiness but do not affect sexual proceptivity or preferences in female gray treefrogs.
    Baugh AT; Gall MD; Silver SC; Bee MA
    Horm Behav; 2021 Apr; 130():104950. PubMed ID: 33556376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby.
    Lindström K; Lehtonen TK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Aug; 280(1765):20130983. PubMed ID: 23804620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-random mating and information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mate Preferences and Choosiness Are Distinct Components of Mate Choice in Eastern Gray Treefrogs (
    Feagles O; Höbel G
    Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):506-517. PubMed ID: 36150198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlational selection on personality and social plasticity: morphology and social context determine behavioural effects on mating success.
    Montiglio PO; Wey TW; Chang AT; Fogarty S; Sih A
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Mar; 86(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 27859289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of age-specific choosiness when mating.
    Cotto O; Day T
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):477-485. PubMed ID: 33314385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
    Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
    Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of age-specific choosiness and reproductive isolation in a model with overlapping generations.
    Cotto O; Servedio MR; Day T
    Evolution; 2022 Feb; 76(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 34877658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.