These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35811789)

  • 21. Investigating the role of spatial filtering on distractor suppression.
    Mohite V; Prasad S; Mishra RK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38148431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learned low priority of attention after training to suppress color singleton distractor.
    Huang Z; Li S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):814-824. PubMed ID: 36175765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning to suppress a distractor may not be unconscious.
    Vicente-Conesa F; Giménez-Fernández T; Luque D; Vadillo MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):796-813. PubMed ID: 36417127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Category-based attentional capture can be influenced by color- and shape-dimensions independently in the conjunction search task.
    Wu X; Wang X; Saab R; Jiang Y
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13526. PubMed ID: 31953842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.
    Vatterott DB; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):485-499. PubMed ID: 29230673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
    Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task-irrelevant valence-preferred colors boost visual search for a singleton-shape target.
    Stanković M; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    Psychol Res; 2024 Mar; 88(2):417-437. PubMed ID: 37819500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Hauck C
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1958-1971. PubMed ID: 34561719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are self-caused distractors easier to ignore? Experiments with the flanker task.
    Gao C; Gozli DG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):853-865. PubMed ID: 33155125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
    Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features.
    Addleman DA; Störmer VS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1338-1346. PubMed ID: 35318583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.