These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35813800)

  • 1. Point-wise variability of threshold sensitivity of 24-2 and 10-2 visual fields.
    Rao A; Rao HL; Padhy D
    Taiwan J Ophthalmol; 2022; 12(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35813800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of patient perception of glaucomatous visual field loss and its association with disease severity using Amsler grid.
    Fujitani K; Su D; Ghassibi MP; Simonson JL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184230. PubMed ID: 28949971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of the Amsler Grid Test in Evaluating Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.
    Su D; Greenberg A; Simonson JL; Teng CC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 26783097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central-most Visual Field Defects in Early Glaucoma.
    Chakravarti T; Moghimi S; De Moraes CG; Weinreb RN
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Mar; 30(3):e68-e75. PubMed ID: 33273288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
    Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distribution and Rates of Visual Field Loss across Different Disease Stages in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
    Yousefi S; Mahmoudi Nezhad GS; Pourahmad S; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2018; 1(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 32672633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
    Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
    Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage.
    Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Baseline Age and Mean Deviation Affect the Rate of Glaucomatous Vision Loss.
    Bommakanti N; De Moraes CG; Boland MV; Myers JS; Wellik SR; Elze T; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Jan; 29(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 31688371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glaucoma surgery decreases the rates of localized and global visual field progression.
    Folgar FA; de Moraes CG; Prata TS; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 149(2):258-264.e2. PubMed ID: 20103054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baseline mean deviation and rates of visual field change in treated glaucoma patients.
    Forchheimer I; de Moraes CG; Teng CC; Folgar F; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 21394112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the Impact of Uveitis on Visual Field Progression Using Large-Scale Real-World Data.
    Liu X; Kelly SR; Montesano G; Bryan SR; Barry RJ; Keane PA; Denniston AK; Crabb DP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():144-150. PubMed ID: 31251907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations.
    Rao HL; Begum VU; Khadka D; Mandal AK; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127233. PubMed ID: 25978316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rates of Visual Field Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: Asymmetric Patterns.
    Yousefi S; Sakai H; Murata H; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Garway-Heath D; Weinreb R; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 59(15):5717-5725. PubMed ID: 30513532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
    Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma.
    de Moraes CG; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.