These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35814060)

  • 1. Investigating the Applicability of Alignment-A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Wen C; Hu F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():845721. PubMed ID: 35814060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjusting for Measurement Noninvariance with Alignment in Growth Modeling.
    Lai MHC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):30-47. PubMed ID: 34236919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Reliability Estimation Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Exploratory Structural Equation Models.
    Fu Y; Wen Z; Wang Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):205-224. PubMed ID: 35185157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Partial Factorial Invariance on Cross-Group Comparisons.
    Shi D; Song H; Lewis MD
    Assessment; 2019 Oct; 26(7):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 28598216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Illustration of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Framework on the Passion Scale.
    Tóth-Király I; Bõthe B; Rigó A; Orosz G
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1968. PubMed ID: 29163325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Parker PD; Nagengast B; Asparouhov T; Muthén B; Dicke T
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):524-545. PubMed ID: 28080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.
    Dierendonck C; de Chambrier AF; Fagnant A; Luxembourger C; Tinnes-Vigne M; Poncelet D
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():680124. PubMed ID: 34239484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Dicke T; Parker PD; Craven RG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 31204844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When and how to use set-exploratory structural equation modelling to test structural models: A tutorial using the R package lavaan.
    Marsh H; Alamer A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Nov; 77(3):459-476. PubMed ID: 38361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IRT studies of many groups: the alignment method.
    Muthén B; Asparouhov T
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():978. PubMed ID: 25309470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Quest for Comparability: Studying the Invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) Measure across Countries.
    Scherer R; Jansen M; Nilsen T; Areepattamannil S; Marsh HW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150829. PubMed ID: 26959236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application.
    Byrne BM; van de Vijver FJR
    Psicothema; 2017 Nov; 29(4):539-551. PubMed ID: 29048316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for heterogeneous factor loadings using mixtures of confirmatory factor analysis models.
    Buzick HM
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():165. PubMed ID: 21833229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale in a Representative Greek Sample.
    Tsigilis N; Gregoriadis A; Grammatikopoulos V; Zachopoulou E
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():733. PubMed ID: 29867688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multidimensional structure and measurement invariance of school engagement.
    Lee S
    J Sch Psychol; 2021 Dec; 89():20-33. PubMed ID: 34836574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale in three South African samples: A bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling approach.
    Cromhout A; Schutte L; Wissing MP
    Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2760-2787. PubMed ID: 34176348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of L2 grit among Chinese EFL high school students and its enduring effect on achievements: A bifactor model approach.
    Liu E; Wang J; Bai S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():971495. PubMed ID: 36248450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data.
    Booth T; Hughes DJ
    Assessment; 2014 Jun; 21(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 24682748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type I error rates and power of several versions of scaled chi-square difference tests in investigations of measurement invariance.
    Brace JC; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):467-485. PubMed ID: 27893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.