These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35814508)
1. How to be a Good Reviewer for a Scientific Journal. Siau K; Kulkarni AV; El-Omar E J Clin Exp Hepatol; 2022; 12(4):1238-1243. PubMed ID: 35814508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to review a paper. Benos DJ; Kirk KL; Hall JE Adv Physiol Educ; 2003 Dec; 27(1-4):47-52. PubMed ID: 12760840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for approaching peer review of a scientific manuscript. Sedaghat AR; Bernal-Sprekelsen M; Fokkens WJ; Smith TL; Stewart MG; Johnson RF Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 9(3):e1266. PubMed ID: 38835335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Science and Art of Reviewing Papers to Maintain Standards in Academia. Ganapathy K Neurol India; 2021; 69(6):1547-1550. PubMed ID: 34979639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review? No thanks! Castelo-Branco C Climacteric; 2023 Feb; 26(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 36420749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. Faggion CM Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals. Igi R J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer reviewer survey for Peterson C; Orticio C; Nugent K Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent); 2023; 36(1):132-134. PubMed ID: 36578584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.]. Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. Polak JF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 7645496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subspecialty Influence on Scientific Peer Review for an Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal With a High Impact Factor. Parikh LI; Benner RS; Riggs TW; Hazen N; Chescheir NC Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 129(2):243-248. PubMed ID: 28079780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer. Kotsis SV; Chung KC Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):958-964. PubMed ID: 24675196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender and Geographic Origin as Determinants of Manuscript Publication Outcomes: JBMR® Bibliometric Analysis from 2017 to 2019. Rivadeneira F; Loder RT; McGuire AC; Chitwood JR; Duffy K; Civitelli R; Kacena MA; Westendorf JJ J Bone Miner Res; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2420-2434. PubMed ID: 36063372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposal for 'segmented peer review' of multidisciplinary papers. Dinakaran D; Anaka M; Mackey JR Transl Oncol; 2021 Feb; 14(2):100985. PubMed ID: 33333371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tips and guidelines for being a good peer reviewer. Gisbert JP; Chaparro M Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Mar; 46(3):215-235. PubMed ID: 35278500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review. Benson PJ Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to review a scientific paper. Tandon R Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():124-7. PubMed ID: 25248566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]