132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35815700)
1. Making an art into a science: a mathematical "Likert tool" can change PI-RADS (v2) scores into Likert scores when reporting multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer.
Stevens WM; Parchment-Smith C; Melling PP; Smith JT
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1245-1254. PubMed ID: 35815700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Likert better than PI-RADS at predicting prostate cancer on MRI and can a mathematical algorithm achieve similar results?
Stevens W; Parchment-Smith C; Adiotomre E; Hulson O; Khan A; Melling P; Pierre S; Smith J
Acta Radiol; 2023 Sep; 64(9):2659-2666. PubMed ID: 37438925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Pantelidou M; Shaida N; Koo B; Caglic I; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200298. PubMed ID: 32479105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Likert vs PI-RADS v2: a comparison of two radiological scoring systems for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Khoo CC; Eldred-Evans D; Peters M; Bertoncelli Tanaka M; Noureldin M; Miah S; Shah T; Connor MJ; Reddy D; Clark M; Lakhani A; Rockall A; Hosking-Jervis F; Cullen E; Arya M; Hrouda D; Qazi H; Winkler M; Tam H; Ahmed HU
BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 31599113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scoring System: Multiparametric MR Imaging Validation Study to Screen Patients for Initial Biopsy.
Renard-Penna R; Mozer P; Cornud F; Barry-Delongchamps N; Bruguière E; Portalez D; Malavaud B
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):458-68. PubMed ID: 25599415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audit of cancer yields after prostate MRI using both the PI-RADS version 2 and Likert scoring systems.
Sokhi HK; Wilson A; Pindoria N; McNamara C; Padhani AR; Meer Z; Pope A
Clin Radiol; 2022 Jul; 77(7):541-547. PubMed ID: 35570157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Fasulo V; de la Calle CM; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 33483265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.
Emmett L; Buteau J; Papa N; Moon D; Thompson J; Roberts MJ; Rasiah K; Pattison DA; Yaxley J; Thomas P; Hutton AC; Agrawal S; Amin A; Blazevski A; Chalasani V; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Sheehan-Dare G; Kooner R; Coughlin G; Chan L; Cusick T; Namdarian B; Kapoor J; Alghazo O; Woo HH; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy D; Hofman MS; Stricker P
Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and follow-up to avoid prostate biopsy in 4259 men.
Venderink W; van Luijtelaar A; van der Leest M; Barentsz JO; Jenniskens SFM; Sedelaar MJP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Overduin CG; Fütterer JJ
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124(5):775-784. PubMed ID: 31237388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Cancer Detection Percentages of Repeat Biopsy in Patients with Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert 3-5) and Negative Initial Biopsy. A Mini Systematic Review.
Grivas N; Lardas M; Espinós EL; Lam TB; Rouviere O; Mottet N; van den Bergh RCN;
Eur Urol; 2022 Nov; 82(5):452-457. PubMed ID: 35985901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
Davenport MS; Montgomery JS; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Shankar PR; Rajendiran T; Shao X; Lee E; Denton B; Barnett C; Piert M
J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):337-343. PubMed ID: 31420496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.
Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
