These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3581715)

  • 1. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology. Compatibility testing 1983-1984: the influence of variables in test procedures on detection of incomplete antibodies.
    Holburn AM; Prior D
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1987; 9(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 3581715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The UK national external quality assessment scheme in blood group serology. Compatibility testing 1979-1980: trends and performance in relation to practice in antiglobulin testing.
    Holburn AM; England JM
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1982; 4(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 7116796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology, Compatibility testing 1979-1980.
    Holburn AM; England JM
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1982; 4(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 7067374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The UK national external quality assessment scheme in blood group serology. Compatibility testing 1981-1982: performance and practice.
    Holburn AM; Prior D
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1984; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 6525800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology. ABO and D grouping, antibody screening, direct antiglobulin test and antibody identification 1984-1985.
    Holburn AM; Prior DM; Whitton CM
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1988; 10(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 3130215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology. ABO and D grouping and antibody screening 1982-1983.
    Holburn AM; Prior D
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1986; 8(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 3093139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-stage papain-indirect antiglobulin test and LISS direct agglutination are not appropriate for pretransfusion screening for unexpected antibodies.
    Pereira A; Mazzara R; Gelabert A; Castillo R
    Haematologica; 1991; 76(6):475-8. PubMed ID: 1820984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the polyethyleneglycol antiglobulin test in the detection and identification of erythrocyte antibodies].
    Jiménez Marco MT; Hernández Maraver D; Rodríguez de la Rua A; de la Cámara Mendizábal C; Canales Albendea M; Jiménez Yuste V; Hernández Navarro F
    Sangre (Barc); 1998 Feb; 43(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9577178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of three low-ionic-strength solutions for routine pretransfusion testing: antibody screening/identification, cross-matching, immune anti-ABO detection, and direct antiglobulin tests.
    Kaspi E; Mallié F; Gouvitsos J; Dettori I; Chiaroni J; Ferrera V
    Transfusion; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2772-3. PubMed ID: 20163691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pretransfusion blood group serology. Limited value of the antiglobulin phase of the crossmatch when a careful screening test for unexpected antibodies is performed.
    Heistø H
    Transfusion; 1979; 19(6):761-3. PubMed ID: 118557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New techniques for compatibility testing.
    Plapp FV
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 113(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 2493236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of the crossmatch in testing for serologic incompatibility.
    Oberman HA; Barnes BA; Steiner EA
    Transfusion; 1982; 22(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 6801826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-ionic strength media for rapid antibody detection: optimum conditions and quality control.
    Voak D; Downie DM; Darnborough J; Haigh T; Fairham SA
    Med Lab Sci; 1980 Mar; 37(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 7401948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proficiency testing in immunohaematology in Ontario, Canada, and in the United Kingdom: a comparative study.
    Pinkerton PH; Zuber ED; Wood DE; Holburn AM; Prior D
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 38(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 3923059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study to determine the safety of omitting the antiglobulin crossmatch from pretransfusion testing.
    Heddle NM; O'Hoski P; Singer J; McBride JA; Ali MA; Kelton JG
    Br J Haematol; 1992 Aug; 81(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 1390245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (blood transfusion laboratory practice): trends in proficiency and practice between 1985 and 2000.
    Knowles SM; Milkins CE; Chapman JF; Scott M
    Transfus Med; 2002 Feb; 12(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 11967133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the manual Polybrene test in the routine hospital laboratory.
    Fisher GA
    Transfusion; 1983; 23(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 6340270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
    Mempel W; Alraun K; Leeping M; Kirschner M; Reiser H; Heim MU
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Problem-solving in immunohematology: direct compatibility laboratory test ].
    Mannessier L; Roubinet F; Chiaroni J
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2001 Dec; 8(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 11802611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resolution of red cell compatibility testing problems in patients receiving anti-lymphoblast or anti-thymocyte globulin.
    Swanson JL; Issitt CH; Mann EW; Condie RM; Simmons RL; McCullough J
    Transfusion; 1984; 24(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 6710586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.