These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35819156)

  • 1. Five-year Survival after McKeown Compared to Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-based Nationwide Study in Finland.
    Junttila A; Helminen O; Helmiö M; Huhta H; Kallio R; Koivukangas V; Kokkola A; Laine S; Lietzen E; Meriläinen S; Pohjanen VM; Rantanen T; Ristimäki A; Räsänen JV; Saarnio J; Sihvo E; Toikkanen V; Tyrväinen T; Valtola A; Kauppila JH;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jun; 277(6):964-970. PubMed ID: 35819156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term health-related quality of life after McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.
    Jezerskyte E; Saadeh LM; Hagens ERC; Sprangers MAG; Noteboom L; van Laarhoven HWM; Eshuis WJ; Hulshof MCCM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(11):. PubMed ID: 32444879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy: a Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study.
    Okamura A; Watanabe M; Okui J; Kuriyama K; Shiraishi O; Kurogochi T; Abe T; Sato H; Miyata H; Kawaguchi Y; Sato Y; Nagano H; Takeno S; Nakajima M; Matsuo K; Murakami K; Takebayashi K; Matsumoto S; Okumura T; Kakeji Y; Kono K; Oridate N; Toh Y; Takeuchi H; Katori Y;
    Esophagus; 2024 Oct; 21(4):438-446. PubMed ID: 39134901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
    Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McKeown Versus Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Patients with a History of Total Pharyngolaryngectomy: A Comparison Study.
    Kuriyama K; Okamura A; Kanie Y; Maruyama S; Sakamoto K; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
    World J Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(10):2479-2487. PubMed ID: 37432423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Verstegen MHP; Slaman AE; Klarenbeek BR; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Rosman C; van Workum F
    World J Surg; 2021 Nov; 45(11):3341-3349. PubMed ID: 34373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
    Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy on Lymph Node Yield and Short-Term Outcomes in Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Nation-Wide Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Kingma BF; Hagens ERC; Van Berge Henegouwen MI; Borggreve AS; Ruurda JP; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R
    Dig Surg; 2023; 40(1-2):58-68. PubMed ID: 36882004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database.
    Sabra MJ; Alwatari YA; Wolfe LG; Xu A; Kaplan BJ; Cassano AD; Shah RD
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Apr; 68(4):370-379. PubMed ID: 31933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-Term Survival After Transhiatal Versus Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Nationwide Study in Finland.
    Junttila A; Helminen O; Helmiö M; Huhta H; Kallio R; Koivukangas V; Kokkola A; Laine S; Lietzen E; Meriläinen S; Pohjanen VM; Rantanen T; Ristimäki A; Räsänen JV; Saarnio J; Sihvo E; Toikkanen V; Tyrväinen T; Valtola A; Kauppila JH;
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 29(13):8158-8167. PubMed ID: 36006492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival after Ivor Lewis versus McKeown esophagectomy for cancer: propensity score matched analysis.
    Luijten JCHBM; Verstegen MHP; van Workum F; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Wijnhoven BPL; Verhoeven RHA; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jul; 36(7):. PubMed ID: 36617230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Ivor-Lewis, Mckeown, or Sweet Esophagectomy.
    Yang YS; Shang QX; Yuan Y; Wu XY; Hu WP; Chen LQ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 30298418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the effect of Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and McKeown esophagectomy on perioperative anxiety and depression in patients with esophageal cancer.
    Du J; Kang Z; Zhao Z; Wu H; Chen Y; Zhang C; Chen Y; Liang W; Wang Q; Ma J
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 33(3):200-207. PubMed ID: 37823407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.