These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35819588)

  • 21. Age-related influences on lexical selection and orthographic encoding during homophone spelling.
    White KK; Abrams L; Palm GM; Protasi MA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 21787089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic and perceptual effects on recognition memory: evidence from ERP.
    Nyhus E; Curran T
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():102-14. PubMed ID: 19505439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural mechanisms of semantic interference and false recognition in short-term memory.
    Atkins AS; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1726-34. PubMed ID: 21349335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Homophone effects in visual word recognition depend on homophone type and task demands.
    Kerswell L; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Sears CR; Owen WJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18266508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conjunction errors and semantic transparency.
    Wong M; Rotello CM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19966238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Memory illusions and category malleability: False recognition for goal-derived reorganizations of common categories.
    Soro JC; Ferreira MB; Carneiro P; Moreira S
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):885-902. PubMed ID: 32383150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory.
    Bodner GE; Huff MJ; Taikh A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1281-1294. PubMed ID: 32399916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Production of picture names improves picture recognition.
    Hourihan KL; Churchill LA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Mar; 74(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 31393155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration provide separate contributions to memory.
    Kirchhoff BA; Schapiro ML; Buckner RL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1841-54. PubMed ID: 16356323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decomposing the semantic processes underpinning veridical and false memories.
    Gatti D; Rinaldi L; Marelli M; Mazzoni G; Vecchi T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):363-389. PubMed ID: 34941346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The production effect in paired-associate learning: benefits for item and associative information.
    Putnam AL; Ozubko JD; Macleod CM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 24154982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Listening to Puns Elicits the Co-Activation of Alternative Homophone Meanings during Language Production.
    Rose SB; Spalek K; Abdel Rahman R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130853. PubMed ID: 26114942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Word predictability blurs the lines between production and comprehension: Evidence from the production effect in memory.
    Rommers J; Dell GS; Benjamin AS
    Cognition; 2020 May; 198():104206. PubMed ID: 32035323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. False recognition modality effects in short-term memory: Reversing the auditory advantage.
    Lim LCL; Goh WD
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104008. PubMed ID: 31252074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.
    Ozubko JD; Major J; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):509-24. PubMed ID: 23713784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.
    Burt JS; Jared D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1302-21. PubMed ID: 26158491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiple species of distinctiveness in memory? Comparing encoding versus statistical distinctiveness on recognition.
    Gretz MR; Huff MJ
    Memory; 2020 Sep; 28(8):984-997. PubMed ID: 32892708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditioning the distinctiveness account: Expanding the production effect to the auditory modality reveals the superiority of writing over vocalising.
    Mama Y; Icht M
    Memory; 2016; 24(1):98-113. PubMed ID: 25483326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accessing characters in spoken Chinese disyllables: An ERP study on the resolution of auditory ambiguity.
    Chen X; Huang G; Huang J
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Jan; 610():187-92. PubMed ID: 26589544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterizing production: the production effect is eliminated for unusual voices unless they are frequent at study.
    Wakeham-Lewis RM; Ozubko J; Fawcett JM
    Memory; 2022 Nov; 30(10):1319-1333. PubMed ID: 36107805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.