These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35819588)

  • 41. Semantic processes leading to true and false memory formation in schizophrenia.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Ghetti S; Ramsay I; Solomon M; Yoon J; Carter CS; Ragland JD
    Schizophr Res; 2013 Jul; 147(2-3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23623175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evidence for adult age-invariance in associative false recognition.
    Pansuwan T; Breuer F; Gazder T; Lau Z; Cueva S; Swanson L; Taylor M; Wilson M; Morcom AM
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):172-186. PubMed ID: 31868124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Directed forgetting meets the production effect: distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting.
    Hourihan KL; Macleod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 19071992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multiple dimensions of semantic and perceptual similarity contribute to mnemonic discrimination for pictures.
    Naspi L; Hoffman P; Devereux B; Thejll-Madsen T; Doumas LAA; Morcom A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1903-1923. PubMed ID: 34472918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A preliminary investigation into the neural basis of the production effect.
    Hassall CD; Quinlan CK; Turk DJ; Taylor TL; Krigolson OE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 27244355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs non-elaborative processing.
    Forrin ND; Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):470-80. PubMed ID: 23705973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. False recognition across meaning, language, and stimulus format: conceptual relatedness and the feeling of familiarity.
    Fazendeiro T; Winkielman P; Luo C; Lorah C
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 16028580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Why seemingly more difficult test conditions produce more accurate recognition of semantic prototype words: A recognition memory paradox?
    Jou J; Escamilla EE; Torres AU; Ortiz A; Perez M; Zuniga R
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Aug; 63():239-253. PubMed ID: 30008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Negativity bias in false memory: moderation by neuroticism after a delay.
    Norris CJ; Leaf PT; Fenn KM
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Jun; 33(4):737-753. PubMed ID: 29986626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Schacter DL; Cendan DL; Dodson CS; Clifford ER
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Dec; 8(4):827-33. PubMed ID: 11848606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory?
    Pesta BJ; Murphy MD; Sanders RE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 11294435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition.
    Bodner GE; Taikh A; Fawcett JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23884689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Widening the boundaries of the production effect.
    Forrin ND; Macleod CM; Ozubko JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1046-55. PubMed ID: 22528825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Rapid acquisition through fast mapping: stable memory over time and role of prior knowledge.
    Li C; Hu Z; Yang J
    Learn Mem; 2020 May; 27(5):177-189. PubMed ID: 32295838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Recognition-induced forgetting is caused by episodic, not semantic, memory retrieval tasks.
    Maxcey AM; McCann M; Stallkamp S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 32034720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.
    Ozubko JD; Gopie N; MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 22127849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differential effects of semantic processing on memory encoding.
    Fliessbach K; Buerger C; Trautner P; Elger CE; Weber B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Nov; 31(11):1653-64. PubMed ID: 20162599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.